All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far.

Reply Thu 20 Sep, 2018 11:26 pm
All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far.

Published September 14, 2018
With Paul Manafort’s new plea deal Friday, special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has now indicted or gotten guilty pleas from 32 people and three companies — that we know of.

That group is composed of four former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Six of these people (including now all four former Trump aides) have pleaded guilty.

If you also count investigations that Mueller originated but then referred elsewhere in the Justice Department, you can add plea deals from two more people to the list.

It’s a sprawling set of allegations, encompassing both election interference charges against overseas Russians, and various other crimes by American Trump advisers.

However, Mueller hasn’t yet alleged any crimes directly connecting the two — that is, alleging that Trump advisers conspired with Russian officials to impact the election. He is continuing to investigate that.

Other reported focuses of Mueller’s investigation — such as potential obstruction of justice by the Trump administration — have also not resulted in any indictments yet.

The full list of known indictments and plea deals in Mueller’s probe

1) George Papadopoulos, former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, was arrested in July 2017 and pleaded guilty last October to making false statements to the FBI.

2) Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, was indicted on a total of 25 different counts by Mueller’s team, related mainly to his past work for Ukrainian politicians and his finances. He had two trials scheduled, and the first ended in a conviction on 8 counts of financial crimes. To avert the second trial, Manafort struck a plea deal with Mueller in September 2018.

3) Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide and Manafort’s longtime junior business partner, was indicted on similar charges to Manafort. But in February he agreed to a plea deal with Mueller’s team, pleading guilty to just one false statements charge and one conspiracy charge.

4) Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty last December to making false statements to the FBI.

5-20) 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies were indicted on conspiracy charges, with some also being accused of identity theft. The charges related to a Russian propaganda effort designed to interfere with the 2016 campaign. The companies involved are the Internet Research Agency, often described as a “Russian troll farm,” and two other companies that helped finance it. The Russian nationals indicted include 12 of the agency’s employees and its alleged financier, Yevgeny Prigozhin.

21) Richard Pinedo: This California man pleaded guilty to an identity theft charge in connection with the Russian indictments, and has agreed to cooperate with Mueller.

22) Alex van der Zwaan: This London lawyer pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Rick Gates and another unnamed person based in Ukraine.

23) Konstantin Kilimnik: This longtime business associate of Manafort and Gates, who’s currently based in Russia, was charged alongside Manafort with attempting to obstruct justice by tampering with witnesses in Manafort’s pending case this year.

24-35) 12 Russian GRU officers: These officers of Russia’s military intelligence service were charged with crimes related to the hacking and leaking of leading Democrats’ emails in 2016.

Finally, there are two other people Mueller initially investigated, but then handed over to others in the Justice Department to handle. Both eventually agreed to plea deals.

Michael Cohen: Trump’s former lawyer pleaded guilty to 8 counts — tax and bank charges, related to his finances and taxi business, and campaign finance violations, related to hush money payments to women who alleged affairs with Donald Trump.

Sam Patten: This Republican operative and lobbyist pleaded guilty to not registering as a foreign agent with his work for Ukrainian political bigwigs, and agreed to cooperate with the government.

That’s the full list, but we’ll delve into the charges in a bit more detail below.

The four ex-Trump aides who struck plea deals with Mueller

So far, no Trump associates have been specifically charged with any crimes relating to helping Russia interfere with the 2016 election.

Yet four have pleaded guilty to other crimes. Manafort and Gates were charged with a series of offenses related to their past work for Ukrainian politicians and their finances. Papadopoulos and Flynn both admitted making false statements with investigators to hide their contacts with Russians.

Papadopoulos: Back in April 2016, Papadopoulos got a tip from a foreign professor he understood to have Russian government connections that the Russians had “dirt” on Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails.” He then proceeded to have extensive contacts with the professor and two Russian nationals, during which he tried to plan a Trump campaign trip to Russia.

But when the FBI interviewed Papadopoulos about all this in January 2017, he repeatedly lied about what happened, he now admits. So he was arrested in July 2017, and later agreed to plead guilty to a false statements charge, which was dramatically unsealed in October 2017.

Initially, it seemed as if Papadopoulos was cooperating with Mueller’s probe. But we later learned that the special counsel cut off contact with him last year, after he talked to the press. In the end, he didn’t provide much information of note, Mueller’s team said in court filing. His involvement with the investigation is now over, and in September 2017, he was sentenced to 14 days incarceration.

Flynn: In December 2016, during the transition, Flynn spoke to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about sanctions that President Barack Obama had just placed on Russia, and about a planned United Nations Security Council vote condemning Israeli settlements.

But when FBI agents interviewed him about all this in January 2017, Flynn lied to them about what his talks with Kislyak entailed, he now admits. In December 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to a false statements charge and began cooperating with Mueller’s investigation. We haven’t seen the fruits of his cooperation yet, and he has not yet been sentenced.

Manafort and Gates: This pair worked for Ukrainian politicians (and, eventually, the Ukrainian government) for several years prior to the Trump campaign, and made an enormous amount of money for it. Mueller charged them with hiding their lobbying work and the money they made from it from the government, as well as other financial crimes and attempts to interfere with the investigation.

Gates was the first to strike a plea deal. In February, Mueller dropped most of the charges he had brought against him. In exchange, Gates pleaded guilty to two counts — one conspiracy to defraud the United States charge encompassing the overall Ukrainian lobbying and money allegations, and a false statements charge. (With the latter, Gates admitted lying to Mueller’s team during a meeting this February. A Dutch lawyer, Alex van der Zwaan, also pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI related to his Ukrainian work with Gates.)

Manafort, meanwhile, fought the charges in two venues, Washington, DC and Virginia. His first trial was in Virginia, and in August, it ended with his conviction on 8 counts — 5 counts of subscribing to false income tax returns, 1 count of failing to report his foreign bank accounts, and 2 counts of bank fraud. The jury deadlocked on another 10 counts, so for those, the judge declared a mistrial.

The conviction finally brought Manafort to the table, and on September 14, he and Mueller’s team struck a plea deal requiring his cooperation. Manafort pleaded guilty to just 2 more counts — conspiracy to defraud the United States, and an attempted obstruction of justice charge. But he admitted that the other allegations Mueller previously made against him were true as well.

About two dozen overseas Russians have been charged with election interference

Mueller has also filed two major indictments of Russian nationals and a few Russian companies for crimes related to alleged interference with the 2016 election: the troll farm indictment, and the email hacking indictment.

The troll farm indictment: Brought in February, here Mueller alleged crimes related tothe propaganda efforts of one Russian group in particular: the Internet Research Agency. That group’s operations — which included social media posts, online ads, and organization of rallies in the US — were, the indictment alleges, often (but not exclusively) aimed at denigrating Hillary Clinton’s presidential candidacy and supporting Donald Trump’s.

Mueller indicted the Internet Research Agency, two other shell companies involved in financing the agency, its alleged financier (Yevgeny Prigozhin), and 12 other Russian nationals who allegedly worked for it.

The specific charges in the case include one broad “conspiracy to defraud the United States” count, but the rest are far narrower — one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and six counts of identity theft. It is highly unlikely that the indicted Russian individuals will ever come to the US to face trial, but one company involved, Concord Catering, is fighting back in court.

No Americans have been charged with being witting participants in this Russian election interference effort. However, one American, Richard Pinedo of California, pleaded guilty to an identity fraud charge, seemingly because he sold bank account numbers created with stolen identities to the Russians. Pinedo agreed to cooperate with the probe as part of his plea deal.

The email hacking indictment: Brought in July, here Mueller charged 12 officers of the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, with crimes committed to the high-profile hacking and leaking of leading Democrats’ emails during the 2016 campaign.

Specifically indicted were nine officers of the GRU’s “Unit 26165,” which Mueller alleges “had primary responsibility for hacking the DCCC and DNC, as well as the email accounts of individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign” like John Podesta. Three other GRU officers, Mueller alleges, “assisted in the release of stolen documents,” “the promotion of those releases,” “and the publication of anti-Clinton content on social media accounts operated by the GRU.”

A trial here is unlikely, since all of the people indicted live in Russia.

Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort associate, has been charged with obstruction of justice

Then, Konstantin Kilimnik — who worked with Manafort in Ukraine and is now based in Russia — was charged alongside Manafort with obstruction of justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice, in June.

Mueller argued that, earlier in 2018, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together to contact potential witnesses against Manafort and encourage them to give false testimony. He argues that this is attempted witness tampering, and qualifies as obstruction of justice.

The alleged tampering relates to the “Hapsburg group”— a group of former senior European politicians Manafort paid to advocate for Ukraine’s interests.

Both Manafort and Kilimnik tried to contact witnesses to get them to claim the Hapsburg group only operated in Europe (where US foreign lobbying laws don’t apply). But Mueller says there’s ample evidence that the group did work in the US too, and the witnesses thought Manafort and Kilimnik were trying to get them to commit perjury.

In Manafort’s September plea deal, he admitted to this. Kilimnik, however, is in Russia, and will likely remain there rather than face charges.

Michael Cohen and Sam Patten struck plea deals after Mueller referred their investigations elsewhere

Last but not least, there are two known instances where Mueller surfaced incriminating information about people, but handed off the investigations into them to elsewhere in the Justice Department.

Michael Cohen: Mueller’s team was investigating Trump’s former attorney in 2017, but at some point, they referred the Cohen probe to the US Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It was SDNY that authorized the FBI raid of Cohen’s residence and office in April.

In August, Cohen cut a deal. He agreed to plead guilty to 8 counts. Six of them involved his own finances — 5 tax counts involving hiding various income related to his taxi medallion business and other financial transactions from the US government, and a bank fraud count.

More salaciously, Cohen admitted participating in a scheme to violate campaign finance laws in connection with hush money payments to women alleging affairs with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Cohen admitted causing an unlawful corporate campaign contribution, by orchestrating a hush money payment of $150,000 from American Media Inc. (the parent company of the National Enquirer) to former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

He also admitted himself paying $130,000 to porn actress Stormy Daniels days before the 2016 general election, and said it was at candidate Trump’s direction. The crime here was in violating campaign donation limits (individuals are permitted to give only a few thousand dollars a year to a federal campaign, and Cohen’s payment was far above that).

Sam Patten: A GOP lobbyist who had worked in some of the same Ukrainian circles as Manafort and alongside Konstantin Kilimnik, Mueller’s team began investigating Patten, but at some point handed him off to the DC US attorney’s office. However, the plea deal Patten eventually struck obligated him to cooperate with Mueller.

According to a criminal information document filed by the DC US attorney’s office, Patten and Kilimnik (who is not named but referred to as “Foreigner A”) founded a lobbying and consulting company together. They did campaign work in Ukraine and lobbying work in the US, and were paid over $1 million between 2015 and 2017.

Specifically, the document claims that Patten contacted members of Congress and their staffers, State Department officials, and members of the press on behalf of his Ukrainian clients — all without registering under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, as required by law.

Patten also admits to helping his Ukrainian oligarch client get around the prohibition on foreign donations to Donald Trump’s inauguration committee. The oligarch sent $50,000 to Patten’s company, and then he gave that money to a US citizen, who bought the four tickets. The tickets were given to the oligarch, Kilimnik, another Ukrainian, and Patten himself.

Finally, Patten also admits to misleading the Senate Intelligence Committee and withholding documents from them during testimony this January. He pleaded guilty to one count of violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 13 • Views: 4,304 • Replies: 78

Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:56 am
Cohen has been speaking to Mueller "at length" according to Bloomberg. Plus, remarkably, he is speaking to him without any agreements with Mueller in place. I am not sure if it is love of country or just plain vengeance, either way good news for Mueller.

No telling what Manafort is going to offer up for leniency in his sentencing.
0 Replies
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2018 10:37 am
@Real Music,
Just asking.

Is there any evidence of Russian collusion?
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2018 12:19 pm
Just asking.


Does that get you moist?
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2018 06:07 pm
Among all of these, is there some evidence that the president colluded with the Russians to fix the election? Obstruction charges where there is no underlying crime are pathetic. They can always get you on that by asking enough questions to which they know the answer. Sooner or later, you make some trivial mistake and they nail you for obstruction.
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2018 07:40 pm
Obstruction charges where there is no underlying crime are pathetic. They can always get you on that by asking enough questions to which they know the answer. Sooner or later, you make some trivial mistake and they nail you for obstruction.

It's the DisUnited Banana Republic so what can you expect, Brandon?
0 Replies
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2018 08:46 pm
I'm curious if you have any examples where it was a trivial mistake and someone was convicted of obstruction.

Not saying it hasn't happened, but wondering if it has.
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 01:08 am
They can always get you on that by asking enough questions to which they know the answer. Sooner or later, you make some trivial mistake and they nail you for obstruction.
Interesting. Wouldn't they have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Person A purposely hindered the investigation?

So it wouldn't just have to be a factually incorrect answer, but a lie - with the FBI would have to prove that Person A knew that the answer they gave was incorrect (which is what a lie is), and misleading in a way that hinders the investigation (which is what I understand obstruct to be).

Example of the difference between telling a lie, and obstructing: they ask me my mothers name and I give a false one - unless they were chasing my mother as part of the investigation, how could it obstruct the investigation? (so, it needs a lie, that is also <ie plus> an obstruction)

That seems to be what each of those people in the article were charged with.

I'd be very interested to see any examples that you have of your claimed issue making it through court on any regular basis, if at all.
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 12:07 pm
Interesting. Wouldn't they have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Person A purposely hindered the investigation?

You really know you don't have to ask, vikorr. You know full well what grand liars occupy the power structure of the USA.

Just read my signature line. As if you haven't already. Still in total denial of reality, aren't you?

0 Replies
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 12:42 pm
I see a flabby stomach, a bald criminal, with a firearm. No. That doesn't "get me moist".
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 01:12 pm
That doesn't "get me moist".

It sure does for izzy.
0 Replies
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 01:13 pm
a bald criminal,

Not remotely close to every US prez since WWII,
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 03:36 pm
Do you have anything to add to a thread, other than slanging off at people?
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 03:55 pm
Do you have anything to add to a thread,

Indeed, but that would mean that you would have to address what I asked of you. Countries that maintain black hole torture chambers around the world aren't rule of law countries.

Your question was fatuous.
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 04:24 pm
So, nothing.
0 Replies
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 04:26 pm
@Real Music,
I see the the entire affair of the Mueller investigation as an attempt to impeach Trump. It has only enough to do with those pother people as it gets closer to that main goal. It is not an exercise of investigating Russian collusion with the Trump campaign because the Democrats all know they were the ones to make it up. So people are going down because Mueller wants to be able to say that there is progress being made in the case. Those people probably deserve to be brought to justice, perhaps except for Papadopoulos, who I suspect was set up with the whole story by those in the FBI who are Leftist and corrupted.

There is so much to go into, so I'll just stop there. I am in complete disagreement with the Mueller probe, and I hope justice does get served on those in government who are found guilty of running this witch hunt.
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 04:41 pm
Wasn't Comey in the early stages of probing the links? Didn't Trump fire Comey because he wouldn't stop the investigation? Whenever a leader tries to stop the process of law, for his own personal gain, then it's time to dig deeper. People should be glad that Meuller continued. Dictators around the world use police forces for their own personal ends, so that is a path you never want a leader to go down - putting in place a series of events that lead to gaining control of a police force (ie. Keep appointing bootlickers to the top positions, until they influence the rest of the police force, who start to understand that the only path to promotion is through meeting certain political demands, and so on down the slippery slope).

I'm not sure why anyone defends him:
- the world views him as a joke
- he lurches from one disaster to another
- he is almost clueless about foreign policy (I'll grant he's actually improving)
- he wants bootlickers around him,
- he fires those that aren't bootlickers (yes men never make for good government). How many has he gone through? How many have resigned because of his behaviour? Has any president, ever, experienced even close to such interpersonal office turmoil?
- he throws tantrums when he doesn't get his way
- he doesn't handle criticism well at all
- he frequently & publicly throws wild allegations and insults around

Perhaps he has his good traits - the above is what makes it through the news over here.

Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 04:44 pm
We don't know what the evidence is. Mueller has been keeping his cards close to the vest.

He is a professional, my suspicion is that when Mueller is ready with the case he is building, that Trump is screwed.
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 05:35 pm
No. That's CNN or one of those other news organizations saying things like that. You should watch Fox at least to get what else is going on. I know they trained people not to watch Fox, beginning some years ago, but if you aren't trained, you might stomach listening to what is really going on. Comey wasn't the only one fired, the investigation goes on, Comey didn't stop it. Firing Comey didn't stop the investigation. What stopped the investigation about Russian collusion is 1) collusion isn't illegal and 2) the Democrats made the whole thing up.
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2018 06:03 pm
I live in Australia. Pretty much every channel reports in the same way on US matters. Is he not tweeting the things he's reported to be tweeting? Firing lots of people <for a president>? Throwing wild allegations around? etc

What on my list that you think is wrong? What on my list do you agree with?

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
  1. Forums
  2. » All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far.
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 09/16/2021 at 07:31:25