kickycan wrote:Which brings up another question...would rock stars still be the legends they are if they weren't good-looking? I mean, say Jimi had Tiny Tim's body, and Marty Feldman's eyes? What if he had a hump on his back and horrible acne scars all over his face? Would he still have been regarded as such a legend? I wonder...
There are a lot of really "pretty" people out there trying to make it as rock stars, etc., but their good looks will only take them so far. Sure, they're much, much more pleasant to look at than your description above (hideous as it is - geez! ), but in the long run, who're you going to continue to want to listen to over and over again? Who's albums/CD's will you continue to buy, the ones with the pretty covers or the ones with the tremendous tunes inside? In my book, talent trumps looks when it comes to music...
'Course if you're thinking about groupies, the guy you described above may not be as successful as say someone who looks like Bon Jovi (not one of my favorites, anyway) but if he had musical talent, he'd be a lot more successful in other ways.