6
   

IM GIVING UP ON NATURAL SELECTION

 
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Apr, 2009 02:06 pm
It sounds as if ros has no idea how to answer RL's question and contents himself, as usual, with just slagging it off. It also sounds as if ros thinks science can't answer it either.

And when one considers the relative nobility of the competing hypotheses it is easy to see why 85% of Americans accept the noblest in the absence of any definitive answer to the question. The other 15% probably have some subjective reason for choosing the baser one.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Apr, 2009 02:56 pm
@rosborne979,
After several years of explaining the concept that common ancestor doesnt mean direct parentage, I think we just gave up on RL's speciosity. (I just made that up)
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Apr, 2009 03:14 pm
Good word, though . . . useful . . .
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Apr, 2009 03:16 pm
There can be no nobility in self deception and lies, oh spendi one.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Apr, 2009 04:26 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
After several years of explaining the concept that common ancestor doesnt mean direct parentage, I think we just gave up on RL's speciosity. (I just made that up)

Is that like the Pomposity of Speciousness? Smile
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Wed 22 Apr, 2009 05:05 pm
@rosborne979,
Or the "Pomposity of Spendi." LOL
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 03:56:55