1
   

Please delete this thread

 
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 04:22 pm
I googles "subatomic particles" and they had the regulars (electron, proton, neutron) and a list of quarks (up, down, charmed, strange, top, bottom) and some other things I'd never heard of.

And yeah, top/to works.

Recap (so I don't have to keep looking back!).

So far we think:

2 ort/tort, leaving t
3 nought/ought, leaving n
5 rank/crank, leaving c
6 baths/bathos, leaving o
7 cave/crave, leaving r

And maybe's

1 bail/basil, leaving s or cover/clover, leaving l
9 top/atop or to, leaving a or p
11 mot/moot, leaving o

so most likely: t n c o r

perhaps: s/l a/p o

Still need

4 A progenitor turns into a dolt
8 A chorus member adds on through water purification
10 A mongrel turns into a parish priest
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 05:05 pm
mother becomes a mouther
cur becomes a cure (with an accent on the e)
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 05:18 pm
Oh yes!

I'd been working on cur/curate but couldn't find any derivations that would fit! Excellent.

My dictionary defines "mouther" as one who mouths, an affected speaker - is that the same as a dolt?
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 05:55 pm
please delete
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:08 pm
Please delete
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:20 pm
Reread the clue. you are changing "nothing" to "a duty" via a loss. Nought/ought is great answer. Interesting that "ought" can also mean nothing.

Which country are we working with for these clues? I would think a "mouther" is one that mouths the words when he reads. My cousin uses the term "mouth breather" to define a dolt. Not applicable here but I just find it very descriptive.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:34 pm
I'm thinking "mouther" does work then!

I think nought/ought is sure-fire.

So now we have: t n c o r u e

Perhaps: s/l a/p o

And: 8 A chorus member adds on through water purification
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:40 pm
please delete
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:45 pm
I started with: "alto, bass, basso, tenor and baritone" but didn't get anywhere so I started thinking "singer, dancer" but haven't gotten far with that either.

Wateer purification? Heat? Boil? Chlorine? Iodine? I'm lost!
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:46 pm
Quote:
Reread the clue. you are changing "nothing" to "a duty" via a loss. Nought/ought is great answer. Interesting that "ought" can also mean nothing.


Thanks for that. I have been working on this so long I forgot where I got nought. I was double checking my answers and for some reason started looking at loss and then couldn't match it. Too many late nights!
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 06:50 pm
please delete
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 10:14 pm
11. The end of a unit of measure becomes irrelevant or debatable

What's wrong with my original suggestion?
(f)oot > moot

"oot" is the end of "foot" which is a unit of measure. The "(f)" was just to show where "oot" came from.
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Mar, 2005 10:22 pm
please delete
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Mar, 2005 05:16 pm
Did you figure it all out?

Is that why you want the thread deleted?

I really think you need to tell us all the answer!
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Mar, 2005 05:40 pm
YY
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Mar, 2005 08:36 am
I don't think they can delete threads, what?.

People who are googling for answers to this puzzle always have the option of NOT reading the thread. Of course, their will power would have to beat out their curiosity!

Maybe you could go back and edit your first post with a "spoiler alert" warning those who want to do the puzzle themselves not to read the posts.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Mar, 2005 08:46 am
You got my interest - what's the deal here?
Somebody get a snuggy or wedgie ?
0 Replies
 
what-
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Mar, 2005 08:06 am
Sorry
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Mar, 2005 09:10 am
Don't apologize - it was fun!

Even if the puzzle is flawed it was still a great excersize in thinking in a very non-linear way.

I enjoyed the puzzle a lot and I hope you post some more like it in the future.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Mar, 2005 10:34 am
an interesting read
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lovatts - Question by margaret schwerin
1001 Ways to Call Someone "Stupid." - Discussion by DrewDad
Famous People Name Game - Discussion by Mame
Cities and Towns of USA - Discussion by Miller
Post about the one before you - Discussion by Green Army Sniper
Where am I - Travel Game II. - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
WHAT'S NEXT? - Discussion by Rod3
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 08:26:44