0
   

The Disadvantaged Many: "Why?"

 
 
Reply Mon 24 Jan, 2005 12:09 pm
By Paul Andrew Bourne, MSc. (candidate);BSc. (Hons); Dip Edu.


William Edward Burghardt DuBois, to his admirers, was by spirited devotion and scholarly dedication, an attacker of injustice and a defender of freedom
Gerald C. Hynes


W.E.B. (William Edward Burghardt) DuBois was born to Alfred and Mary Burghardt DuBois on February 23, 1868 in a small New England village of Great Barrington, Massachusetts, United States, where the African American community was small in numbers but were very well respected (McKissack 17). DuBois' father, Alfred, left the family home for good when DuBois was young (i.e. left home soon after he was born) and so he was raised by his mother, Mary (McKissack 16). He was the only child for his mother, Mary, who emphasized education and hard work as the vehicle of social mobility and success. DuBois was the first African American to have graduated of his class and the foremost African American to have graduated in Great Barrington (DuBois 99).

Because Fisk University was not located in Great Barrington but to the South, DuBois had to relocate to Tennessee where he first experienced overt segregation and racism. Although W. E. B. DuBois was experiencing segregation, he was still able to surround himself with educated African-Americans and liberal whites who were instrumental in awakening the social consciousness within this young man. He later posits, "I was tossed boldly into the ?'Negro Problem' . . . I suddenly came to a region where the world was split into white and black halves, and where the darker half was held back by race prejudice and legal bonds, as well as by deep ignorance and dire poverty" (DuBois 108). This may have begun the social reformist consciousness within DuBois and may have propelled the willing to use himself as an example to both the white and black races.

On graduating from Fisk University in 1888 with a BA in Philosophy, between 1888 and 1890, he entered Harvard University as a junior and received a B.A cum laude. DuBois did post graduate work at Harvard University between 1890 and 1892 where he pursued and successfully completed a M.A in sociology. He was angered by his ex-president Rutherford B Hayes's assertion that he (Rutherford Hayes) could not find a worthy student to take advantage of a fund to educate Negro students. This assertion angered DuBois, the later reformist and social activist, greatly and so he applied directly to Hayes and was given the grant.

While DuBois was at Harvard University, he distant himself from the system, he felt the purpose of him being there was to "Improve the condition of the race as a whole" (McKissack, 30). DuBois was so adamant about the segregation that while at Harvard, he chose not to socialize with many of the other Harvard students, choosing instead to spend his time with the African-American in Boston, encasing himself in a completely coloured world (DuBois, 136). It was during that period that DuBois solidified his belief that education was the cure of his people. He believed that "the problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the colour line, the relation of the darker to the lighter races of men in Asia and Africa, in America and the islands of the seas" ( Weinberg, 81). As such, DuBois theorize that education was the only way the African-American will save themselves from poverty and racism. In 1896, he was awarded a PhD from Harvard; his dissertation read "Suppression of the African Slave Trade" (DuBois). He was the first African American to have received a Ph.D. from the University (Harvard).

Between 1892 and 1895, while completing his doctorial dissertation, DuBois brilliantly projected the possibility of subjecting to scientific scrutiny the problem of race in the modern world. This inevitably placed DuBois in an irreparable conflict with the social Darwinism, and the hereditarianism research programme which attempted to verify it. Between 1897 and 1914, Dubois conducted numerous studies of black society in America, he published 16 research papers. He began his investigations believing that social science could provide answers to race problems. Gradually he concluded that in a climate of virulent racism, social change could only be accomplished by agitation and protest. These were the dominant ?'ideoshanal' and research paradigms on race matters with Anglo American social psychology of the time. Both actively capitulated and apologized for racism, both vigorously supported class exploitation; each claimed that social structure and social behaviour for the consequences of inherited genetic characteristics.

DuBois began his academic and public careers at a time when the forces of reaction had achieved political, ?'ideoshanal' and cultural supremacy in the United States. It was within this background that he began his long journey in pursuit of the truth. He taught that this truth could be studied through scientific investigation. Scientific rigor and an unbending partisanship to the cause of African-American equality defined the part he chose. In retrospect, Du Bois' scientific effort has prevailed over both Herbert Spencer's and Francis Galton's research programme of scientific racism. W. E. B. DuBois brought back the German scientific ideal from the University of Berlin and was one of the first to initiate scientific sociological study in the United States.

Dr DuBois thrust eagerly and indepthly into research. He believed that the race problem (segregation and white racism) was one of ignorance. So, he was determined to unearth scientific knowledge as much as he could, thereby provide the "cure" for color prejudice. Williams' unrelenting research led into historical investigation, statistical and anthropological measurement, and sociological interpretation. The outcome of this exhaustive endeavor was published as The Philadelphia Negro (Hynes). "It revealed the Negro group as a symptom, not a cause; as a striving, palpitating group, and not an inert, sick body of crime; as a long historic development and not a transient occurrence." This was the first time such a scientific approach to studying social phenomena was undertaken.

On the completion of the study (the scientific observation of The Philadelphia Negro), he accepted a position at Atlanta University to further his teachings in sociology. For approximately thirteen (13) years there DuBois wrote and intensely studied the Negro morality, urbanization, Negroes in business, college-bred Negroes, the Negro church, and Negro crime. William DuBois also repudiated the widely held view of Africa as a vast cultural cipher by presenting a historical version of complex, cultural development throughout Africa. His works left no issue unturned in an effort to promote and help social reform. Many argue that because of DuBois' outpouring of information "there was no study made of the race problem in America which did not depend in some degree upon the investigations made at Atlanta University."

"When will society propel the Blacks to place of 'true' status within this world?"
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 951 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jan, 2005 03:02 pm
Why just "the blacks"? What about the "yellows, browns and reds"? Are we all not humans, equal in aspiration?
0 Replies
 
theantibuddha
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jan, 2005 03:23 pm
Currently we have a world where if a person made a racist comment most people around them would either assume it was a joke, or give them a strange look.

But probably one day in the future if two very white guys worked with a black woman and a new guy came to work with them who said something about her being a black woman, one would probably say "She's black!?" and the other would say "She's a woman?!"...

People will continue to get better. It's been happening rather steadily and should continue to do so.

But all of humanity is a single species. The difference between "races" is incredibly small, genetically speaking.
0 Replies
 
paul andrew bourne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 09:36 am
"Racial Remark"
Paul Andrew Bourne, MSc. (candidate); BSc. (Hons); Dip. Edu.



The issue of equality of the races is not a new discourse. This situation dates back to early civilization. 'Man' has always sought a place to hide his/her biases beneath the disguise of supremacy of perception; and there is a myth of equality by terminology. This position has oftentimes resulted in the marginalization of groups. The examples here are the Nazi relationship with the Jews, the colonization of the world by the Europeans, the invasion of sovereign nations by other states and the issue of dominance of one race over another that result in the introduction of slavery.

Some persons sideline the issue of race as if there is equality of the races in today's market place. This is the "fartherest" from the ontology as was even highlighted by the President of the United States.

There is no such thing as the equality of the races.

Therefore, author's position stands "When will the Blacks be elevated to place of equality?"

The appointed of Dr. Rice to a place of high status cannot be used to equate the equality of opportunities of the Blacks, as the disparity between the ratio of Blacks to Caucasian in post of authority is approximately 1 to 4 respectively.


This is not an issue of simple racism or bigotry but a point of principle of justice for a group of people who are continuously having to interface with bigotry within our societies.

Let us reopen this discourse, "is racism dead" and "are peoples of all races treated justly?"
0 Replies
 
theantibuddha
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 02:07 am
Re: "Racial Remark"
Just clearing up a few questions here.

paul andrew bourne wrote:
Paul Andrew Bourne, MSc. (candidate); BSc. (Hons); Dip. Edu.

The Anti-Buddha, Cert IV (Screen); Second place ribbon (double-mini trampolining); Anti-messiah of the middle way.
Quote:
there is a myth of equality by terminology.

Pardon? These words individually make sense but put together in a sentence I have no idea how one would achieve equality by terminology.
Quote:
There is no such thing as the equality of the races.

Again, this sentence is somewhat ambiguous. What do you mean here? There is currently no perception of the actual fact of equality of the races... or the races are not equal in current standing... or the races are not equal in intrinsic worth?

I have no idea whatsoever what you're attempting to say here and I haven't been able to infer it from context.
Quote:
the disparity between the ratio of Blacks to Caucasian in post of authority is approximately 1 to 4 respectively.

What is the ratio of dark-skinned people to the melanin-challenged within the general population? (I don't live in america and have no idea what the proportions are there... here the ratio is approximately 1 to 10,000 respectively)

And with those questions addressed back to the topic at hand.

Quote:
Let us reopen this discourse, "is racism dead" and "are peoples of all races treated justly?"

Consider the discourse reopened.

Racism can be deceptive in that it may be hidden when it actually exists, and seen when it does not exist.

For example, insults are often based on a particular trait that a person has. Someone may call a disliked black person a n****r, when in fact the reason behind making the insult is not actually racist. Yet since it is identified as something likely to offend, it may be used even if the insulter has no racist notions at all if they have sufficient desire to insult the black person.

On the other hand a person may be completely racist and never admit it, then never vote for a black candidate or hire a black applicant. The entire time however they don't make any public comment out of fear of being labelled a racist. As such their attitudes may never be noticed.

So thus it can be hard to determine the exact degree to which racism continues to exist. Particularly seeing as modern disparities in salary and workforce placement can be the legacy of racism up to a generation ago and possibly even further back in history.

It's hard to judge, but in my opinion racism is gradually decreasing. (with the exception of the spiked racism towards arabs, yet "wartime" racism is a different matter I think).
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Disadvantaged Many: "Why?"
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/17/2026 at 02:00:53