0
   

IF A TREE FALLS IN THE FOREST . . .

 
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2003 04:43 pm
Ahem, we are talking trees aren't we? There is the possibility that you guys are all identifying much too closely with the trees, which is really quite nice--it shows how sensitive you all are.
Tree huggers all--what a bunch of sweeties!
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2003 04:46 pm
trees
I prefer bushes myself.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2003 04:54 pm
Actually one can easily get lost in a "bush"!
0 Replies
 
babsatamelia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2003 09:21 pm
WELL NOW, EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF "BUSH"
ARE YOU REFERRING TO????
COULD WE BE A LITTLE BIT FRISKY TODAY?
YOU SOUND LIKE AN INTERESTING FELLOW,
DOESN'T HE, GIRLS??
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 08:57 am
Watch your tongue!! babst;

Hmm, does size matter?
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 01:52 pm
Go for it Babs, you are a brave woman. All I can say is that his posture is excellent.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 02:22 pm
posture
Posture? As in Homo Erectus?
0 Replies
 
babsatamelia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 02:37 pm
Well - ahem, bogowo started it. Embarrassed
Easily lost in a bush, indeed.
Whatever else did you think I
would be imagining after a
statement like that? Just whose
bush would you be getting lost
in, may I inquire? The whole
thing, well, it just sounded a
wee bit sexual to me, but then
that is no doubt because of
my own reasons, but, anyway
in response to YOUR question:
no, I don't think that size is an
issue which matters in any way
at all, that I can think of. Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 03:53 pm
bushes
Babs, when I said I preferred bushes, it did not think for a moment that the conversation would evolve (no, devolve) to discussion of sexuality and size. Oh my goodness. Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 05:29 pm
I am absolutely shocked! (yeh right!)

I was completely sure when you said you preferred "Bush"es, that you were refering to one rather short (hence reference to size), smirking, not completely "there", one might say "without it" conservative politician.

I had no idea.............

[The spring flowers should grow merrily after that one!]
0 Replies
 
Algis Kemezys
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2003 07:25 pm
If a tree falls in the florist, they aren't just selling flowers.
0 Replies
 
Equus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 03:24 pm
If a tree falls in the florist, and there's nobody there, they probably should have been in a different kind of business altogether.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 04:18 pm
A tree is a tree - how many more do you need to look at.
- Ronald Reagan, California Governor
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 04:25 pm
a tree is just organized sawdust.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 06:04 pm
(Dubya's brain is disorganized sawdust)
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 08:59 pm
bush
That was a great roll, guys. Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 09:12 pm
And if only the smirking bush could be dust to sawdust--then, ashes to asscroft, wouldn't two of our most pressing problems be blowin' on the wind?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 09:15 pm
Please excuse the digression, folks ..

Pssst .. Happy birthday to you, Diane! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 09:26 pm
bush
Spoken like an experienced Catholic, Diane. Msolga, that was no digression. Happy birthday, Diane. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2003 09:51 pm
Happy Birthday to you, Diane!

I remembered a bruhaha about Reagan saying trees cause smog, so I just checked on Google: http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/080/nation/For_trees_complex_role_in_smog+.shtml

Indeed they do produce isoprenes, which combine with products of automobile combustion to create ozone. There's apparently no smog production, though, without that auto exhaust.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 08:48:38