Does anyone have any ideas as to how to crack this puzzle?
0 Replies
Magus
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 01:34 pm
43
0 Replies
Magus
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 01:34 pm
43
0 Replies
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 01:41 pm
Why 43, Magus?
0 Replies
markr
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 02:53 pm
I doubt this is the answer, but I like 27. It makes the total and the averages squares. There is also a square number of pieces.
0 Replies
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:12 pm
Interesting.
0 Replies
makemeshiver33
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:14 pm
I say 40
0 Replies
quiksilver
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:18 pm
magus and makemeshiver, please tell me your reasons why you think it is the missing number. markr, unfortunately, you wasn't right but hey! you can have another chance.
0 Replies
makemeshiver33
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:21 pm
I believe its a pattern.
0 Replies
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:24 pm
It's a pattern? How cryptic, Makemeshiver.
Care to elaborate?
0 Replies
cavfancier
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:25 pm
Are these all red states?
0 Replies
quiksilver
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 04:39 pm
cavfancier wrote:
Are these all red states?
yes
0 Replies
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 05:04 pm
What is the significance of the numbers then?
Hold on a minute, is it the number of electoral votes for each state at the convention?
0 Replies
makemeshiver33
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 09:19 pm
I didn't get to finish my post earlier.........excuse me.
Yes a pattern........duh
Why I say 40,..I can't explain my reasoning for it, thats just what I think it is........lol Theres just something with the pattern of the numbers that leads me to believe that.........
0 Replies
makemeshiver33
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 09:24 pm
Well if its not 40, then its 39..lol
0 Replies
Magus
1
Reply
Thu 13 Jan, 2005 11:23 pm
You have to get intuit...
0 Replies
Instigate
1
Reply
Fri 14 Jan, 2005 11:27 am
I think 27 also....it completes the square.
-moots
0 Replies
quiksilver
1
Reply
Fri 14 Jan, 2005 01:10 pm
Instigate wrote:
I think 27 also....it completes the square.
-moots
so why can't it be 84 which also completes the square?
0 Replies
markr
1
Reply
Fri 14 Jan, 2005 02:44 pm
27 yields a "perfect" square, since 28 is a perfect number. :wink: