605
   

NeoPets Riddles (Lenny Conundrums) and Answers Here

 
 
friendsforever
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 10:59 pm
When I first read the question, I knew it was going to involve calculus. Sigh...I think I will wait until next week to upgrade my trophy. I give.
0 Replies
 
klee
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 11:11 pm
okay, this may come off as irrevelent but they said egg not ball so would the whole spherical thing still work?
0 Replies
 
friendsforever
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 11:21 pm
Found this:

http://www.1728.com/sphere.htm

Enjoy.
0 Replies
 
friendsforever
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 11:24 pm
It says its a perfect sphere after it says its and egg.
0 Replies
 
klee
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 11:25 pm
oh whoops, missed that part ^^;; thanks/sorry
0 Replies
 
edstock
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 11:32 pm
markr wrote:
Plug that into the volume formula for a spherical cap:
280000 = (1/3)*pi*h^2*(3*R-h)
and solve for R.

Plug R into the volume formula for a sphere.


Aaaargh, I typed +h instead of -h in my Excel formula! All that calculus to calculate the spherical cap volume formula (I didn't find the Wolfram site) and I mistype a sign and submit the wrong answer.

Nice work, markr, but you really ought to make people do some of the numerical calculations themselves.
0 Replies
 
rurebeccalyn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:03 am
gahh im so terrible at math!

so would the answer be 388889?

stupid lenny conundrum!
0 Replies
 
misspelt
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 01:22 am
I got the same answer as markr but several hours later due to other commitments. Thanks for the formulae, was using wikipedia's formula for volume of spherical cap initially and had the extra variable of the radius of the base of the cap. Quite straightforward using markr's method.
0 Replies
 
stormygoddess
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 10:25 am
rurebeccalyn wrote:
gahh im so terrible at math!

so would the answer be 388889?

stupid lenny conundrum!


Several very kind people have already given the FORMULA on how to get the correct answer. YOU need to plug in the data from the program and come to the answer on your own.

No one is just going to right out and give it to you numerically. This site is not about just giving you the answer. Some of us are good at puzzles and logic and some of us are math type people.. but we work together to find the method on how to get the answer.

Unfortunately, some weeks the answer gets posted right out in the open, but that's not the way most of us prefer it.

Begging for the answer just makes you look like an ass wanting to do none of the work and take all the credit anyway. Either chip in and help do the work, and spend 10 minutes solving the problem with the SOLUTION already given. If you only want the answer without needing to do ANY work, just go somewhere else.
0 Replies
 
ChillyElmo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 10:28 am
Lenny Conundrum
Hey guys. Ok we need to set things straight, we don't know what volume of egg is displacing the water, i assumed it was 72% but now i think this is wrong. One persons comment was that it is simply 100% of the volume of the water displaced to the volume of the egg, this could be true.

If not i have no idea how to figure out the volume of egg that is displacing the water so that it is possible to figure out the volume of the egg
0 Replies
 
stapel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 11:40 am
Round 252: Volume of sphere, given volume of spherical cap
The 'Lenny' authors, in Round 252, wrote:
While strolling through Tyrannia one bright sunny day, you came across a Grarrl egg. It was a perfect sphere. You placed it in a tub of water and found that it displaced exactly 280,000 cubic centimetres. However, it was floating on the water, and only 72% of the surface area of the egg was below the water line.

What was the total volume of the egg, in cubic centimetres? Please round to the nearest whole number.

The submerged portion of the sphere is represented by a shape called a "spherical cap". For a sphere of radius R, the surface area A and volume V are given by:

. . .sphere with radius R:

. . . . .A = 4 (pi) R^2

. . . . .V = (4/3) (pi) R^3

By "truncating" the sphere (that is, by chopping off a portion of it), we are left with part of a sphere, with the missing portion represented by a flat surface, being a circle with radius r. The "height" of the whole sphere is obviously 2R (or the length of the diameter); the height of the truncated sphere is "h".

For a spherical cap with flat-surface radius r and height h, formed from a sphere with radius R, the surface area A and volume V are given by:

. . .spherical cap with radius R, cap radius r,
. . .and height h:

. . . . .A = 2 (pi) R h

. . . . .V = (1/6) (pi) (3 r^2 + h^2) h

The relationship between the radius R of the sphere and the radius r of the flat surface of (the circle formed by) the spherical cap is given by:

. . . . .R = (r^2 + h^2) / (2h)

We are given that only 72% of the egg's total surface is wetted when allowed to float in water. This means that the surface area of the spherical cap is 0.72 of the surface area of the entire sphere. That is:

. . . . .2 (pi) R h = 0.72 [4 (pi) R^2]

Solving, we get:

. . . . .2 (pi) R h = 4 (pi) (0.72) R^2

. . . . .R h = 2 (0.72) R^2

. . . . .h = 2 (0.72) R

. . . . .h = 1.44 R

Plugging this into the relationship between the circle's radius r and the sphere's radius R, we get:

. . . . .R = (r^2 + h^2) / (2h)

. . . . .R = (r^2 + 2.0736 R^2) / (2.88 R)

. . . . .2.88 R^2 = r^2 + 2.0736 R^2

. . . . .(2.88 - 2.0736) R^2 = r^2

. . . . .0.8064 R^2 = r^2

. . . . .sqrt[0.8064] R = r

We are given that the submerged volume (that is, the volume of the spherical cap) is 280,000 cc's. Then:

. . . . .V = (1/6) (pi) (3 r^2 + h^2) h

. . . . .280,000 = (1/6) (pi) (3 (0.8064 R^2) + (2.0736 R^2)) (1.44 R)

. . . . .280,000 = (1/6) (pi) (2.4192 R^2 + 2.0736 R^2) (1.44 R)

. . . . .280,000 = (1/6) (pi) (4.4928 R^2) (1.44 R)

. . . . .280,000 = (1/6) (pi) (4.4928) (1.44) (R^3)

. . . . .280,000 = (1/6) (pi) (6.469632) (R^3)

. . . . .[(280,000) (6)] / [(pi) (6.469632)] = R^3

. . . . .1,680,000 / [6.469 632 (pi)] = R^3

Since the formula for the volume of the sphere involves R^3, we do not need to solve for the value of R itself. Instead, we can proceed directly to finding the volume:

. . . . .V = (4/3) (pi) R^3

. . . . .V = [(4/3) (pi) (1,680,000)] / [6.469 632 (pi)]

. . . . .V = [(4) (1,680,000)] / [(3) (6.469 632)]

. . . . .V = [ 6 720 000 ] / [ 19.408 896 ]

...and so forth.

(Hint: Plug the above into your calculator. Then round the value to the nearest whole number, which is not 388 889.)

stormygoddess wrote:
This site is not about just giving you the answer.... some weeks the answer gets posted right out in the open, but that's not the way most of us prefer it.... Begging for the answer just makes you look like an ass wanting to do none of the work and take all the credit anyway.... If you only want the answer without needing to do ANY work, just go somewhere else.

I completely agree with your sentiment, and I think it is to be regretted that experience has consistently shown that many do indeed want to be "just handed the answer", complete with a guarantee that it's the right answer, and right away ASAP ASAP URGENT HELP HELP NOW!!!!!.

Unfortunately, the "somewhere else's" to which this sort goes are frequently tutoring forums, where they lie and say that the "Lenny" is really a make-or-break take-home math quiz ("I'll flunk for the entire year if you don't give me the right answer right now!!"). In fact, this "math homework" question has already been posted any number of times to Yahoo! Answers (with quite a few of these posts already having been deleted or rebuked); you will note, upon examination, that many of the remaining posts show that the text of the "Lenny" has been munged to disguise the actual origin, a tacit admission that the postings are illegitimate.

As a result of such ill behavior from Neopians, many other sites now customarily ban any user posting Neopets-related material, and are quite happy to see the Conundrums' solution posted, openly and as quickly as possible, in locations such as this one.

Sorry.

Eliz.
0 Replies
 
edstock
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:57 pm
Quote:
(Hint: Plug the above into your calculator. Then round the value to the nearest whole number, which is not 388 889.)


Aw, you are too kind. I would have quit at least 3 lines earlier.
0 Replies
 
stapel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 02:28 pm
edstock wrote:
Aw, you are too kind. I would have quit at least 3 lines earlier.

Doing so would seem, upon a review of past evidence, to presume perhaps too much with respect to diligence and/or intelligence. Take a quick check back through this thread and discover how many times that week's solution has been posted along the lines of:

Quote:
************************
*** THE ANSWER IS ***
************************
** [COPY THIS BIT] **
************************

...and how many times the reply has been, "So what's the answer? Stop making it so hard and just tell me NOW!" Rolling Eyes

I'm currently awaiting complaints that what has been posted for Round 252 ("plug this number into your calculato, then hit the 'divide' key, and then plug the other number in; and round the result displayed on the calculator screen") is, once again, "too hard". And just wait until this discussion laps over onto a new "page". Hitting that "previous" link at the top of the page is apparently just way too confusing and complex! Laughing

Eliz.
0 Replies
 
edstock
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 03:55 pm
stapel wrote:
I'm currently awaiting complaints that what has been posted for Round 252 ("plug this number into your calculator, then hit the 'divide' key, and then plug the other number in; and round the result displayed on the calculator screen") is, once again, "too hard". And just wait until this discussion laps over onto a new "page". Hitting that "previous" link at the top of the page is apparently just way too confusing and complex! Laughing


Oh, you are so right, but I would personally love it if we were able to ignore such people. I do think that posting a full answer after the submissions are closed is a great idea, as Neopets often does a really bad job of showing how to get the answer and people certainly have trouble figuring it out.

During the contest, my preference for math problems would be to put out the relevant formulas and give an overview of how to approach the problem, but not include any calculations. Twisted Evil I'll bet my math background biases me, however.

Anyway, I'm going to do my best to help the discussion move to a new page - I don't really want to share my neopoints with people that can't even navigate through web pages. Laughing (Not that I get any this time anyway, since I added when I should have subtracted in doing my own calculations.)
0 Replies
 
iimpeachyz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 08:33 pm
Hi
Darn, I submitted 388889 BEFORE i found this site.. xD

But thanks stapel for all the help! I was able to find the right answer.
0 Replies
 
Manx
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 10:30 pm
I am not sure if I did it right. But I calculated that 72% of surface area is equal to 54% of the area. But I ended up with a different answer than all of you, not sure if this is mathematically legal though.
0 Replies
 
edstock
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2008 12:12 am
Manx wrote:
I am not sure if I did it right. But I calculated that 72% of surface area is equal to 54% of the area. But I ended up with a different answer than all of you, not sure if this is mathematically legal though.


54% of the area of what? The only thing we have is a sphere and the only area I know of is the surface area of the sphere.
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2008 01:54 am
The general formula turns out to be quite simple:

V = SV / [SA^2 * (3 - 2 * SA)]

where:
SV = submerged volume
SA = submerged surface area as a fraction of total surface area
0 Replies
 
ChillyElmo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2008 12:17 pm
Lmao, U have to frickin calculate the are so that u can get it!! so what are u guys do over the 2 weeks that lenny is busy?
0 Replies
 
ardentgailla
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2008 09:24 pm
Thanks!
Thanks so much for working that out. I was looking for help with the Lenny Conundrum...it's been YEARS since I've worked with surface area and volume (no, I am not smarter than a fifth grader). Posting the way to get there helped to jog my memory a bit. So much better when I get to work through it, rather than just giving me the answer.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lenny Conundrum 464 - Question by jreneearias
Lenny Conundrum #463 - Discussion by barkie
Lenny Conundrum (wed) DECEMBER 8 2010 - Question by Joanneexoxo
answers - Question by qftcu1
Lenny Conundrum 354 - Discussion by hippiegirl101
lenny conundrum 4/16 - Question by punkd4life3
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 06/01/2024 at 05:07:57