markr wrote:You can't use the rounded answer to the previous problem and expect to get an accurate answer to this problem.
I agree, mathematically, but I'm not sure if we're supposed to start over from the beginning on this Lenny, or if they want us to start with last week's result. The answer provided earlier starts with last week's final answer, but if one starts again from the beginning, then:
. . . . .radius of circle, as originally computed:
. . . . . . .r = (5/2)sqrt[10] = sqrt[250/4]
. . . . .radius, in millimeters:
. . . . . . .r = (10)sqrt[250/4] = sqrt[6250]
. . . . .area of one tan square, in square millimeters:
. . . . . . .A = (50)(50) = 2500
. . . . .area of circle, in square millimeters:
. . . . . . .A = (pi)(6250)
. . . . .grey area, being the circle less the four tan squares:
. . . . . . .(pi)(6250) - 4(2500) = 6250(pi) - 10,000
. . . . . . . . .= 9634.9540849... (approx)
Rounded to the nearest square millimeter, this method gives a value of 9635 square millimeters.
Which answer a person uses will depend upon the assumption made regarding the starting point for the computations.
Eliz.