605
   

NeoPets Riddles (Lenny Conundrums) and Answers Here

 
 
Galletita
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:03 pm
mmm the answer is 138?
0 Replies
 
Roly Poly Sandwiches
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:04 pm
my answer was 132
0 Replies
 
Roly Poly Sandwiches
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:17 pm
I killed the board tonight
0 Replies
 
Galletita
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:18 pm
so is 138 or 132? or none?
0 Replies
 
primarius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:21 pm
Roly_Poly_Sandwiches wrote:
my answer was 132


I got the same.
0 Replies
 
Subbota
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:26 pm
Rolly Polly got 'em right.
0 Replies
 
switzeraj
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 08:40 pm
Good Job Roly
0 Replies
 
Salt
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:17 pm
I have to admit, I have no idea how you guys solved this... can someone give me a step by step, idiot's guide to solving this problem? I'm more interested in how (mathematically) you guys solved this than the answer.
0 Replies
 
purplemonkey
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:29 pm
Salt wrote:
I have to admit, I have no idea how you guys solved this... can someone give me a step by step, idiot's guide to solving this problem? I'm more interested in how (mathematically) you guys solved this than the answer.


same here... i've looked at all the previous posts but can't seem to piece it together to see how the answer was found. Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
fatmoo13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:38 pm
I'm new here, so this could be (and I probably am) way off base...
I have no idea about the average Grundo weight, but what if you look at the lightest pair (228)...
Assuming the lightest Grundo is only 1 lb., that makes the heaviest Grundo 227 lbs.
Granted, that totally throws off the "average" weight since the 10 weights less 227 range from 1 lb. to 31 lbs.
Is this at all possible? Or is 132 lbs. absolutely the correct answer?

Sorry for being a newb!
Thanks!
0 Replies
 
simplyfallen
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:38 pm
confused
I am confused also. I just want to win once to get the trophy so it doesn't really matter how the answer was found... but i would be interested to know.
0 Replies
 
Subbota
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:42 pm
Total weight of five grundos (a - heaviest, e - lightest) a+b+c+d+e = sum of all 10 measurements / 4 (every single grundo was weighted exactly 4 times) = 606
a+b - the highest available weight = 258
d+e - the lowest one = 228

c= (a+b+c+d+e) - (a+b) - (d+e) = 606-228-258 = 120

a>b>c => a+b>a+c>b+c, so the SECOND heaviest sum weight is sum of a and c
a=252-c=132
0 Replies
 
stapel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:48 pm
Round 160:
elybelly wrote:
Five Grundos took turns weighing themselves on a scale. However, they weighed each other two at a time, ten times total , so that every possible combination of two grundos was weighed. The scale had the following readouts for the pairs: 236 pounds, 244 pounds, 228 pounds, 250 pounds, 258 pounds, 230 pounds, 246 pounds, 238 pounds, 242 pounds, and 252 pounds.

How heavy was the heaviest Grundo?

This is a variant of the classic "haybales" or "pumpkins" problem.

. . . . .Ask Dr. Math: Weighing Bales of Hay (1997)

. . . . .Ask Dr. Math: Weighing Bales of Hay (1996)

Note that the weights in this puzzler, in order, are:

. . . . .228, 230, 236, 238, 242, 244, 246, 250, 252, 258

Then follow the methodology of the above (or other) examples.

Eliz.
0 Replies
 
fatmoo13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 09:54 pm
Not to be too ignorant, but...
In your example of a + c where a=252 and c=132....
Does that make a=252 the heaviest weight?
Which isn't really possible since the lowest weight of two Grundo's is only 228??
0 Replies
 
Jen Aside
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 10:26 pm
You're counting a+c as a. a would actually be 252 - 132, or 120.
0 Replies
 
Roly Poly Sandwiches
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 07:25 am
Jen Aside wrote:
You're counting a+c as a. a would actually be 252 - 132, or 120.


what was said was a= 252 - (c) = 132 where c=120

Please note that the work is on more then just the current page and you can use the previous button to see when the discution for the current LC began
0 Replies
 
Jen Aside
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 09:02 am
fatmoo13 wrote:
Not to be too ignorant, but...
In your example of a + c where a=252 and c=132....
Does that make a=252 the heaviest weight?
Which isn't really possible since the lowest weight of two Grundo's is only 228??


^This is what I'm correcting in my previous post. a alone is not 252, obviously.
0 Replies
 
freakishbecky
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 12:54 pm
Okay...Right, im new, and confused about this lenny conundrum, al this, that you have been saying makes no sence to me! ^_^

Anyone care to make it simpler for me? xD
0 Replies
 
o O2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 02:43 pm
the answer is 132, flat out. that should be easy Wink
0 Replies
 
candygirl2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 04:16 pm
you know what wud be funny
if the answer was 258. which is wat i submitted.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lenny Conundrum 464 - Question by jreneearias
Lenny Conundrum #463 - Discussion by barkie
Lenny Conundrum (wed) DECEMBER 8 2010 - Question by Joanneexoxo
answers - Question by qftcu1
Lenny Conundrum 354 - Discussion by hippiegirl101
lenny conundrum 4/16 - Question by punkd4life3
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 09/22/2024 at 09:24:43