Ray wrote:
This is as valid as what I just said.
You asked a question...I answered it.
Quote:Quote:Really!
That is very interesting.
I think you are wrong.
It's good that you have an opinion, but so do I.
No problem.
But you were going on about what motivates the terrorists...and I am of the opinion that you are wrong.
Just wanted to let your know that.
Quote:Quote:Sounds like your history teacher thought in very simplistic terms...much as you seem to be doing.
Oh no, he was talking about dictatorships, which seems to be mostly the case in history. I was the one that applied it to the terrorists, let's not drag my teacher here.
You wrote: "Like my History teacher once said, many times in history, the truly evil people hides behind the misguided majority. They command and control, but often do not do the dirty works himself/herself."
If that is an accurate recitation of what your history teacher once said...then it is my opinion that your history teacher was thinking in very simplistic terms.
I can only consider what you wrote...and you did write that.
In any case, I did not "drag your history teacher here"...you did.
Quote:Quote:Not in their opinion.
And you seem to be putting an awful lot of weight on your opinion.
You are actually asserting that you KNOW they have done something wrong. MY GUESS: You don't know that at all.
Of course I was stating an opinion and not a fact. If I wanted to put in fact, I'd put in numbers, and historical events. I didn't think I need to state that I was merely stating a hypothesis.
Well...once again, I can only go by what you actually wrote...rather than what you now say you meant.
You wrote: "
What I know, however, is that these terrorists in killing innocent people have done something wrong."
That does not sound like someone offering an opinion. It sounds as though someone is revealing a truth that he KNOWS. In fact...you actually use the words "What I know..." So save your protestations of offering opinions...unless you actually do offer them as opinions.
You are correct that you did not need to state that you were merely stating a hypothesis...but when you state a hypothesis (without stating that it is a hypothesis) it makes a hell of a lot more sense not to state it as something you know.
Interesting discussion, Ray. Do continue it.