I stand by my observation.
Thok,
I suggest you relax a bit and resist the temptation to be excessively judgemental.
dlowan's intent and meaning in the sentence that so disturbed you were clear enough, even despite the very, very slight ambiguity you noted. There was nothing at all in that or prior posts of hers that at all supported the conclusion you reached regarding her intent.
The fact is the somewhat loose organization of the forces of several nations that inevitably accompanies any UN action truly is a likely factor in such occurrences. Her observation was accurate, and it made sense. It was you, and not she, who jumped to an incorrect conclusion.
