kickycan wrote: How about some specifics about which businesses are the ones that get hurt, or have had to fold because of it?
Well, that Harvard study looked at the same businesses before and after - not general business results.
Can't tell you about businesses that got hurt by the smoking ban in my neighbourhood, as they're all doing as well, or better, except for the Scottish pub that never figured out that they needed to actually serve food that was edible.
The stats here have been quite good, the original version of the ban split out family restaurants from bars. You could smoke in places that didn't allow people under 18. Since people with kids seem to spend more money when they go out, true bars that could still allow smoking - but no kids - started to have some problems. Once the ban went into full effect, things started to equalize (which made/makes no sense to me - but it was the case) again.
The rate of restaurant failure is enormous, always has been. <ask hamburger, he used to be a consultant for the federal business development bank here> What the current stats are showing is that the smoking ban didn't effect the rate of restaurant closings.