1
   

THE BIBLE SPEAKS TO SEVERAL ETHICAL ISSUES IN THIS ELECTION

 
 
husker
 
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 06:49 pm
THE BIBLE SPEAKS TO SEVERAL ETHICAL ISSUES IN THIS ELECTION

Many Americans seek guidance from the Bible for important issues of life, while we recognize that many others do not. With thankfulness for the freedom of all Americans to believe whatever they think best regarding matters of religion an ethics, we offer this statement of our personal understanding of the teachings of the Bible for the thoughtful consideration of all who are interested in how the Bible might speak to ethical issues in the current election.

Supreme Court Justices: People don't often think of the appointment of Supreme Court justices as an ethical issue, but it clearly is now because several decisions of the Supreme Court have imposed on our nation new policies on major ethical and religious questions.

A small majority of our current Supreme Court, and lower courts that follow their example, have gone beyond their Constitutionally-defined task of interpreting laws passed by Congress and state legislatures, and have in effect created new "laws" that have never been passed by any elected body. By this process they have imposed on us decrees that allow abortionists to murder unborn babies (contrary to Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9), "you shall not murder", that protect pornographers who poison the minds of children (contrary to Exodus 20:17, "You shall not covet . . . your neighbor's wife; see also Matthew 5:28), that redefine marriage to include homosexual couples (thus giving governmental encouragement to actions that Romans 1:26-28 says are morally wrong), and that banish prayer, God's name and God's laws from public places (thus prohibiting free exercise of religion, and violating Romans 13:3 which says that government should be "not a terror to good conduct, but to bad"). In taking to itself the right to decree such policies, the Supreme Court has seriously distorted the system of "checks and balances" intended by the Constitution between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.

It is unlikely that any elected body such as a city counsel, state legislature, or the U.S. Congress, would have decreed policies like those mentioned above, for such groups are accountable to the will of the people. Not so the Supreme Court, which is appointed for life. And democratically-elected members of Congress and state legislatures are helpless to change those Court-mandated policies unless the makeup of the Supreme Court is changed. We believe the ethical choices is for a President and for U.S. Senators committed to appointing judges who will follow the original intent of the Constitution and just interpret law and not make it, rather than for candidates who have often voted to block such judges in votes in the Senate.

Defense against terrorists: A fundamental responsibility of government is to "punish those who do evil" (1 Peter 2:14) and thus to protect its citizens. We now face a unique challenge, because terrorists who will sacrifice their own lives in killing others cannot be deterred by the usual threat of punishing a criminal after he commits a crime. While Jesus instructed individuals not to seek personal revenge but to turn the other cheek (Matthew 5:39), the Bible teaches that governments are responsible to "bear the sword" (Romans 13:4) and thus to use force to oppose violent evil. We believe that the ethical choice is for a candidate who will pursue terrorists and, when necessary, use force to stop them before they strike us, not for a candidate who only promises to respond if we are attacked again.

Abortion: The Bible views the unborn child as a human person who should be protected, since David said to God, "You knitted me together in my mother's womb" (Psalm 139:13; see also Psalm 51:5; Luke 1:44), and strong penalties were imposed for endangering or harming the life of an unborn child (Exodus 21:22-23). We believe the ethical choice is for candidates who believe government should give protection to the lives of unborn children, not ones who believe government should allow people to choose to murder their unborn children if they wish.

Homosexual marriage: The Bible views marriage as between one man and one woman, for "a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh" (Genesis 2:24; Ephesians 5:31). Because our courts have shown a troubling tendency to overturn the laws that have already been passed concerning marriage, we believe the ethical choice is for candidates who support a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

Embryonic stem cell research: Creating more human embryos for their stem cells is making the beginnings of babies for the purpose of harvesting their parts, contrary to the command, "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13). There is a good alternative: using adult stem cells for medical research, because this does not destroy the life of the adult whose cells are used. We believe the ethical choice is for a candidate who has decided he will not allow government funds to be spent to create more human embryos just to take their stem cells.
Natural resources: God put human beings on the earth to "subdue it" and to "have dominion" over the animals (Genesis 1:28). We value the beauty of the natural world which God created, and we believe that we are called to be responsible stewards who protect God's creation while we use it wisely and also seek to safeguard its usefulness for future generations. The Bible does not view "untouched nature" as the ideal state of the earth, but expects human beings to develop and use the earth's resources wisely for mankind's needs (Genesis 1:28; 2:15; 9:3; 1 Timothy 4:4). In fact, we believe that the public policy based on the idealism of "untouched nature" hinders wise development of the earth's resources and thus contributes to famine, starvation, disease, and death among the poor. We believe the ethical choice is for candidates who will allow resources to be developed and used wisely, not for candidates indebted to environmental theories that oppose nearly all economic development in our nation and around the world.

Should Christians speak out and try to influence our nations on these issues? God's people in the Bible often spoke about ethical issues to government rulers. Daniel told the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar to practice "righteousness" and to show "mercy to the oppressed" (Daniel 4:27); several Old Testament prophets speak to foreign nations about their sins (Isaiah 13:23; Ezekiel 25-32, Amos 1-2, Obadiah (to Edom), Jonah (to Nineveh), Nahum (to Nineveh), Habakkuk 2, Zephaniah 2); and Paul spoke to the Roman governor Felix "about righteousness and self-control and the coming judgment" (Acts 24:25).
As Christian leaders we agree that the primary message of the New Testament is the good news about salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. But the primary message is not the whole message and another significant part of the New Testament teaches us how people should live. With respect to issues like these we have mentioned, the Bible also teaches us about what kinds of laws governments should have.
The laws of a nation have a significant influence on the nation's moral climate, for good or for ill. This is because laws can either restrain evil or encourage it, and because laws also have a teaching function as they inform people about what a government thinks to be right and wrong conduct.

Therefore we urge pastors and Bible study leaders to teach on these crucial ethical issues facing our nation. We urge all Christians that they have a moral obligation to learn about the candidates' positions, to be informed, and to vote. We urge all Christians to pray that truthful speech and right conduct on both sides would prevail in this election. We also encourage Christians to consider doing even more for the good of our nation, such as giving time or money, or talking to friends and neighbors, or even serving in office themselves. Such influence for good on the direction of our country is one important way of fulfilling Jesus' command, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Matthew 22:19).

Quote:
(The names below represent only the personal views of those signing and not the views of their churches or institutions. Permission is hereby given to reproduce and circulate this statement.)

Dr. Lane T. Dennis, President and Publisher, Good News Publishers/Crossway Books and Bibles
Dr. James Dobson, Chairman, Focus on the Family
Dr. Steve Farrar, Men's Leadership Ministries, Frisco, TX
Dr. Wayne Grudem, Research Professor of Bible and Theology, Phoenix Seminary, Scottsdale, AZ
Dr. Jack Hayford, Chancellor, The King's College and Seminary, Van Nuys, CA, Radio Bible teacher, Living Way
The Hon. Don Hodel, President, Focus on the Family
Dr. R. Kent Hughes, Senior Pastor, College Church in Wheaton, Wheaton, IL
Dr. Robert Lewis, Pastor-at-Large, Fellowship Bible Church, Little Rock, AR
Dr. Crawford W. Loritts, Jr., Author, Speaker, Radio Host, Living a Legacy
Dr. James MacDonald, Senior Pastor, Harvest Bible Chapel, Rolling Meadows, IL, Radio Bible teacher, Walk in the Word
Dr. Paige Patterson, President, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, TX
Dr. Dennis Rainey, President, FamilyLife, Little Rock, AR
Dr. Joseph Stowell, President, Moody Bible Institute (future Teaching Pastor at Harvest Bible Chapel, Rolling Meadows, IL)
Dr. Bruce Ware, Senior Associate Dean, School of Theology, The Southern Baptist Seminary, Louisville, KY
Dr. Stu Weber, Senior Pastor, Good Shepherd Community Church, Gresham, OR
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,581 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
colorbook
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 10:44 pm
Great article Husker. I try to take into consideration certain moral values to reflect on when deciding my vote. However, each of the two main candidates on the November ballot, do not meet these expectations. I believe no politician completely meets these conditions. As a result, it's sad to say, that I have to go with my instincts, and cast my vote for the candidate that I believe will do a better job, as well as care about the best interests of the people and his government, even though his religious convictions may or may not be completely honorable.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 11:07 pm
Husker,
Is that taken from Pat Robertson's "exposé" of the Supreme Court book, Courting Disaster?
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 11:33 pm
InfraBlue wrote:
Husker,
Is that taken from Pat Robertson's "exposé" of the Supreme Court book, Courting Disaster?


nope from a website called walkintheword - Dr. James MacDonald has IMO very great messages - you can listen to a couple by clicking on broadcast
0 Replies
 
Otis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2004 08:48 pm
Re: THE BIBLE SPEAKS TO SEVERAL ETHICAL ISSUES IN THIS ELECT
husker wrote:

Homosexual marriage: The Bible views marriage as between one man and one woman, for "a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh" (Genesis 2:24; Ephesians 5:31). Because our courts have shown a troubling tendency to overturn the laws that have already been passed concerning marriage, we believe the ethical choice is for candidates who support a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman.


I don't even know where to start on this...

First of all, the USA is not a christian nation. The only reason for outlawing same sex marriages is religion. It doesn't affect you nor hurt anyone if two people you don't know get married, no matter what their genders are, so why do you care? The only possible reason is that you are preaching to them. If you want to use the government to preach to people, you are more than welcome to, but not this government. There are plenty of religiously affiliated governments you can go to, but this isn't one of them. This country was founded on the idea of religous freedom. Restricting people's actions to what one religion believes is right is a huge violation of the basis of our country.

I could say that I believe that people should not use electricity on Saturdays because I'm Jewish and that is my sabbath, and on it you are not supposed to display mastery over the universe. Therefore, all electricity should be shut off (except for cases where it can save lives like in hospitals) every Saturday. That is rediculous, they don't even do that in Israel. But that is the same thing as prohibiting same sex marriages. You are enforcing your religion on everyone, regardless of their religion. And it's just as rediculous.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Oct, 2004 08:58 pm
Is it ethical to attack a country, Iraq, on the pretext of "punish those who do evil" (1 Peter 2:14)--"they attacked us" (G.W. Bush)--install a stooge government, incite insurrection and infest it with terrorism when they didn't "attack us" at all?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Oct, 2004 02:36 am
Delusion can be a great thing, Husker.

But I do grant you this: If you use the god described in the Old Testament as the guide...George Bush and the Republican Party are the guy and the party for you.

They fit right in with that pathetic, judgemental, barbaric monster.

If the teachings of the gentle Jesus Christ matter even a tiny bit, however...you would have nothing to do with either Bush or the Republicans.

Unless you are a hypocrite, of course.
0 Replies
 
Otis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Oct, 2004 07:09 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
Delusion can be a great thing, Husker.

But I do grant you this: If you use the god described in the Old Testament as the guide...George Bush and the Republican Party are the guy and the party for you.

They fit right in with that pathetic, judgemental, barbaric monster.

If the teachings of the gentle Jesus Christ matter even a tiny bit, however...you would have nothing to do with either Bush or the Republicans.

Unless you are a hypocrite, of course.


This is very logical. However, ironically enough, most American Jews actually lean toward democratic views on most issues. Go figure.

And calling Jesus "Jesus Christ" is like spelling (Old Testament) God with a capital G. "Christ" means messiah, so if you don't believe that he was really the messiah, you probably don't want to call him "Christ". That's why no educated Jew will call Jesus "Jesus Christ" or "Christ". And for you particualarly, if you don't believe in the Old Testament God, it doesn't make sense to believe that Jesus is Christ.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Oct, 2004 11:12 am
I used Jesus Christ because I didn't want Husker to think I was talking about Jesus Hernandes...the grocery deliveryman.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Oct, 2004 08:11 pm
Jesus crossed the Rio Grande.
0 Replies
 
Otis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Oct, 2004 09:39 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
I used Jesus Christ because I didn't want Husker to think I was talking about Jesus Hernandes...the grocery deliveryman.


Haha, good point. I don't know why I ever doubted you, Frank.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BIBLE SPEAKS TO SEVERAL ETHICAL ISSUES IN THIS ELECTION
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 01:58:12