@Olivier5,
Quote:Thanks for the info.
That's misinformation.
The MSM is corporate-owned infotainment masquerading as a news outlet. They repeat what they get "down the wire" from AP (Associated Press) or Murdoch "news". So instead of being reporters, they are repeaters.
The MSM was so convinced of Hillary's insurmountable lead coming up to the election, that they began putting together articles and "news" segments congratulating her on her victory. Magazine covers had already been printed showing her accepting victory. In fact, HRC herself hadn't prepared a concession speech, such was her belief in her own "press".
During election coverage, these repeaters kept on referring to her as president Clinton, and, as you've seen, even right up to the day of final decision from the electoral college, the Trump haters were still shilling for a Hillary win, as if their predictions could never be wrong.
As for the claim that bloggers are a good or reliable source for news; they would have to present some actual source material that wasn't from the MSM to carry some credibility. Sources like wikileaks, Edward Snowden, RT news, and even Al Jazeera are carrying more crediblity than the MSM, which is why there's now a push to have this type of outlet declared as "Fake News ™" so that the AP and Rupert Murdoch, and their repeaters can push their agenda without opposition again.
Hence my claim that the people didn't follow the script. All the exit polls (push polls, in effect) were so far off the mark, they now carry no credibility either.
Hope that clears things up for you, Olivier.