0
   

Back to the future in Russia???

 
 
dlowan
 
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2004 10:05 pm
Full Washington Post article - free subscription...

"Putin Moves to Centralize Authority
Plan Would Restrict Elections in Russia

By Peter Baker
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, September 14, 2004;

MOSCOW, Sept. 13 -- President Vladimir Putin announced plans Monday for a "radically restructured" political system that would bolster his power by ending the popular election of governors and independent lawmakers, moves he portrayed as a response to this month's deadly seizure of a Russian school.

Under his plan, Putin would appoint all governors to create a "single chain of command" and allow Russians to vote only for political parties rather than specific candidates in parliamentary elections. Putin characterized the changes as enhancing national cohesion in the face of a terrorist threat, while critics called them another step toward restoring the tyranny of the state 13 years after the fall of the Soviet Union.

Under his plan, Russian President Vladimir Putin would appoint all governors. (Russian Tass Via Reuters)

"Under current conditions, the system of executive power in the country should not just be adapted to operating in crisis situations, but should be radically restructured in order to strengthen the unity of the country and prevent further crises," Putin said during a televised meeting with cabinet ministers and governors. "Those who inspire, organize and carry out terrorist acts seek to bring about a disintegration of the country, to break up the state, to ruin Russia."

His plans must go through parliament, but the Kremlin controls more than two-thirds of the legislature directly and two other political parties quickly endorsed the ideas. Even the governors, who could lose their jobs, surrendered, either welcoming the plans or remaining silent.

"It's the beginning of a constitutional coup d'etat," said Sergei Mitrokhin, a former parliamentary leader from the liberal Yabloko party. "It's a step toward dictatorship."

Mitrokhin and others decried what they saw as the exploitation of the deaths of 328 children and adults in the southern town of Beslan to justify a power grab. "It's sad that the president has used such a topic as a pretext to do that in order to increase his own power," Mitrokhin said in an interview. "These measures don't have anything to do with the fight against terrorism."..........."


Sound familiar?


"...........The plan was the latest move in a five-year campaign by Putin to consolidate power and neutralize potential opposition in the new Russia. Since coming into office at the end of 1999, Putin's government has taken over or closed all independent national television channels, established unrivaled dominance of both houses of parliament, reasserted control over the country's huge energy industry and jailed or driven into exile business tycoons who defied him.............."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 937 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 07:51 am
Next, hell want to be called TSAR
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:20 am
czar
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:20 am
kaiser
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:21 am
ceasar
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:21 am
bush
0 Replies
 
Galilite
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:35 am
They wanted a strong arm rule - now they got it.
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:48 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
bush


This person doesn't fit in the order....
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:54 am
no but it kinda scans

czar
kaiser
ceasar
bush

afghan
i-raq
i-ran
push
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:59 am
And more:

"From Those Putin Would Weaken, Praise.


MOSCOW, Sept. 14 - On Monday, President Vladimir V. Putin announced he would strip Russia's 89 regions of much of their authority and electoral legitimacy. On Tuesday, not one of the leaders of those regions said a public word of protest.

On the contrary, there were words of praise.

"It is constructive and productive," Murat M. Zyazikov, the president of Ingushetia, said in a telephone interview, embracing a proposal that would leave him serving at the will not of his impoverished electorate in southern Russia, but of the president in faraway Moscow.

If there were any lingering doubts about Mr. Putin's grip on power, the reaction to his sweeping proposal to overhaul Russia's political system - replacing, for instance, the election of governors, presidents and other regional leaders with presidential appointments - swept them away.

A headline in the newspaper Izvestia called it the "September Revolution," equating Mr. Putin's consolidation of power to this country's most famous October, almost 87 years ago. And yet the second day of the revolution passed with barely a murmur of protest, even among those affected most.

In Washington, however, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said that "we have concerns" about Mr. Putin's actions, and that he planned to ask Russian officials to explain the moves. [Page A10.]......"


Full article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/international/europe/15russia.html?th
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 09:02 am
Russia needs a strong man and strong central control.
All power to the Putin
Bring back Saddam
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 09:09 am
Vladimir Putin, of Great Russia, Little Russia and all the Russias, Autocrat . . .
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 09:15 am
Trouble is the name Putin doesnt sound very strong

like steel man Stalin
or Hitler
or even Lenin... (what does that name allude to in Russian, his given name was Vladimir Illych Ulyanov?)

Putin reminds me of Mr Pooter the bumbling Victorian clerk of Grosman? stories
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 09:18 am
Stalin and Lenin are noms de guerre which were adopted to hide the identities of the bearers, which was actually somewhat common at the time they adopted them--the Russian Workers Party was involved in bank-robbing (Stalin's forte) and other charming pursuits which necessitated a certain level of discretion . . .
0 Replies
 
coluber2001
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 03:02 pm
Looks like a return to a dictatorship to me. Putin is grasping all this power under the guise of "protection against terrorism." What Putin is calling international terrorism is actually nationalistic Chehnyans, not Al Queda, against the brutal Russians. Sounds like a bit of intentional confusion on Putin's part, and it reminds me of Bush's intentional confusion regarding the war with Iraq.

Be that as it may, Bush can only dream of having Putin's power.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 03:24 pm
Bush's rhetoric sounds the same as Putin's. Putin came to office promising to "kill terrrorists in there outhouses". Bush has the same kind of rhetoric. Both of them use fighting terrorism as a way to get popular support for things to most reasonable people would find questionable.

Hopefully Americans will learn from Russias example that the tactics of a hard-liner that emphasize toughness over intelligence fail.

I hope Bush doesn't get the chance to bring us in the same bloody direction that Russia and Putin have taken.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Back to the future in Russia???
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 11:47:48