8
   

Existence of God.

 
 
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2016 11:45 am
Note the typical god botherer technique of not telling the entire truth. Newologist attempted to enter the anti-evolution lists earlier, with comments originally addressed by Rosborne, which Newy did not adequately address. Of course, anyone who routinely deals with god botherers quickly learns that honesty is not a commonly observed character trait among them.
neologist
 
  3  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2016 11:49 am
@Setanta,
This seems really important to you.
That's a good sign, I believe.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2016 11:55 am
You're addicted to the moving target technique. Now you want to try psychobabble.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2016 02:16 pm
@neologist,
neologist wrote:
All I provided was the words. You are the salad chef.

You also provided your conflation of their various definitions in your word salad interpretation of 2 Corinthians 4:4.
neologist
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2016 02:57 pm
@InfraBlue,
Keep grading your papers, Blue.
You are good at it.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 03:26 am
@neologist,
Thank you.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 05:14 am
@neologist,
Quote:
A smart guy like that who would gloss over the definitions of hypothesis, theory, and law. Oy

Still peddling that "its only a theory" crap eh?
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 06:00 am
@coluber2001,
Quote:
Any religion has to adapt and evolve with the science and knowledge of the times...

Religion must remain subjective and not try to become objective; that's the realm of science.
Notice any contradiction there?

A belief in God for whatever reason, has no need to support or contradict science. Nor does science have any reason to do the same with God.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 06:05 am
@Leadfoot,
Quote:
belief in God for whatever reason, has no need to support or contradict science.
Tell that to the "believers"

Quote:
Nor does science have any reason to do the same with God.
Agreed, but for a different reason than "equivalence of respect". SCience , real science, should only deal in facts.
Theres not too many departments of cryptozoology or UFOlogy in major Universities
Leadfoot
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 07:11 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Theres not too many departments of cryptozoology or UFOlogy in major Universities
But there are some that have courses in paranormal research and the like. Academia has it's own supernatural hangups. They are ok with that as long as it doesn't smell like religion.
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 07:13 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Leadfoot Quote:
"belief in God for whatever reason, has no need to support or contradict science."


Tell that to the "believers"
I do try...
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 12:20 pm
@jeremiahscheidt,
jeremiahscheidt wrote:
Do you believe in GOD?
If you define what you mean by "GOD" then I would be able to answer you.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 12:24 pm
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
Quote:
Evolution eliminates any need for a "God"
But how did so many constants get to be precisely the right value to allow it
Check out the Anthopic Principle most specifically the Weak Anthopic.
Chumly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 12:26 pm
@neologist,
neologist wrote:

Could you expand on what you mean by GOD?

For some the stomach is god.
What's the point of religion if you're just going to get hungry again?
Leadfoot
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 01:58 pm
@Chumly,
Quote:
Check out the Anthopic Principle most specifically the Weak Anthopic.
It's of no help in explaining abiogenesis. Even if you have all the right conditions and constants, there is nothing that says life must emerge.
neologist
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 03:21 pm
@Chumly,
Chumly wrote:
What's the point of religion if you're just going to get hungry again?
Finally, a question that gets to the heart of the artichoke.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 07:57 pm
@farmerman,
But don't you find the great number of religious universities a contradiction?
I wonder how they handle the subject of "Logic?"
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 10:41 pm
@Leadfoot,
Leadfoot wrote:
Quote:
Check out the Anthopic Principle most specifically the Weak Anthopic.
It's of no help in explaining abiogenesis. Even if you have all the right conditions and constants, there is nothing that says life must emerge.
What's with all this "must" Mr. Strawman (I know straw can get kind'a musty but...)?
Chumly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 10:48 pm
@neologist,
neologist wrote:
Chumly wrote:
What's the point of religion if you're just going to get hungry again?
Finally, a question that gets to the heart of the artichoke.
Seems your sky-god's perfect book emphasizes morality as the art of the choke...








gag.
Chumly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 May, 2016 11:33 pm
@Chumly,
And at the risk of talking to myself (well I am my own best company so perhaps all is not entirely lost) I do hope the separation of churlish and steak is not simply a canard, or a lame duck; albeit the flames of hellfire would provide for a tasty roast and/or eternal reprimand.
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Existence of God.
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/26/2019 at 11:00:29