@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
So 9/11 was done by construction companies, so that they would get reconstruction contracts?
There is a complex economy of human communication and action-networks that result in historical patterns of causation. Causation is not directly mechanical, the way it is with a non-living/non-human machine or system of machines; but there are patterns of influence where, usually, independent human determination proves insufficient to prevent lower desires from culminating in harmful manifestations.
The dot-com bubble started bursting in 2000, for example, before the 9/11 attacks/destruction:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble
In the wake of economic downturn, people
could calm themselves and choose to weather the recession by cutting their expenditures and focusing on basic needs like food and preserving/conserving resources. Too often, however, humans burn through their money and resources and then they get pushy to find more money to go on spending at levels they could have reduced before running low on money.
Often the problem is that people borrow to go on spending and investing bullishly, in hopes that they will be able to keep up with their debt payments, but when they are struggling, they fall under pressure from creditors to keep up with payments somehow or face credit default consequences. Such pressures somehow circulate around the economy in such a way that various destructive and/or wasteful manifestations emerge as a desperate attempt to produce more cash flow where it shouldn't actually be necessary.
In short, because too many people fail to manage their money well and cut their spending in time to save money to weather periods of constrained revenue/income, they end up putting bull-pressure on each other and that pressure culminates in destructive/wasteful activities that effectuate new investment/spending for the sake of resisting deflationary forces, which would improve the economy tremendously if people could manage to deal with deflation in civilized and non-destructive/wasteful ways.
PATTERN OF CHURCH ATTACKS
Now, considering that there has been a pattern of destructive attacks against churches recently, as well as a pattern of sexual abuse accusations that effectuate financial transfers from churches to victims due to the behavior of certain clergy, what are the chances that such patterns are random coincidence verses there being some pattern of copycat attack in the interest of generating some form of economic/financial gain?
Of course it is possible that these are just random accidents, but then why do they occur in such patterned ways across numerous distant locations? It looks more like a social movement than random coincidence, so then the question is what motive could there be for such destruction, and that should lead you to think about what spending/investment is stimulated by it, including insurance payouts, charitable donations, reconstruction plans that can be leveraged to borrow from banks/investors/bonds, etc. etc.
Also consider that such "creative destruction" isn't a new phenomenon, so there is probably a whole covert business of networking to effectuate such destruction and waste for profit, with many networks of kickbacks and other money laundering to pass the money around to everyone who is good at keeping quiet, the same as with any clandestine industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_destruction