@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
livinglava wrote:Is the EU insensitive to non-members?
Non-members aren't in Brexit talks.
What I meant is that if/once UK has non-member status, their interests will/should still be taken into account in EU budgeting/etc. because the EU is not an exclusively self-interested entity geared toward competing with and exploiting/abusing non-members as much as possible (or at least hopefully it's not).
The EU is (or should be) simply an institution for facilitating social-economic interactions both within designated regions and between designated regions and the world beyond them.
Would you say that the purpose of the EU is to build up internal strength against external governments? I.e. is it supposed to act as a competitive and/or imperial unified entity that seeks to oppress those who don't seek to join and harmonize with it?
If not, then why wouldn't it seek constructive relations with a post-Brexit UK, regardless of whether there is a deal or no deal? Why is planning and regulation so important? Why can't the EU simply express clear expectations about what it can and can't accept from an independent post-Brexit UK and then levy tariffs or otherwise effectuate policies with regard to them?
It seems like the EU only wants to deal with governments that submit to its authority and not with independent governments. Maybe I am oversimplifying this or being naive in some way, but is it reasonable to expect everyone to submit to contractual obligations in order to interact with them? Why isn't it possible to interact with others in the absence of such stipulations and agreements?