Re: Bible in Aramaic?
Miller wrote:Are you saying that Biblical Hebrew and Modern Hebrew are very similar? If so, why in the world are the 2 taught in school as separate and distinct? At many Divinity Schools, for a Master's Degree, the candidate must pass two years of Biblical Hebrew.
However, to gain entrance to a US rabbinical college, the candidate must pass oral and written tests in Modern Hebrew, but not Biblical Hebrew. THis requirement has never made any sense to me, even when explained to me by an American Rabbi.

Oops, typo corrected, thanks :-) . You got me right.
Technically, this is the same language. However, a lot of concepts and constructions are obsolete (for example, future tense serves to mark the past, etc.), and the reading is not easy even for Hebrew speakers. However, it's possible. It is like reading original Shakespeare. It's still English, isn't it? But not that trivial to understand.
Academy of Hebrew Language and those who resurrected Hebrew, made tremendous efforts to keep the modern language close to the Biblical one by substituting normally internationalized words to those created from native Hebrew roots, just like the French did. Some of those odd creations survived ("mahshev" = "computer", "reshemkol" = "dictaphone", "hashmal" [probably derived from Biblical term of electron

] = "electricity", etc.), some didn't. Waste of time if you ask me

.
Frankly, I don't understand the logic behind the requirements for US rabbinical colleges. Public relations with the mother ship

?