Reply																		
							Thu 17 Jun, 2004 03:48 am
						
						
					
					
					
						(-K)^2 = (-K)(-K) = +K^2
(-K)^3 = (-K)(-K)(-K) = -K^3
How would you write this?
(-K)^0 = ? = +1
An engineer at work wanted to know this and he asked me because he thought I was at uni this year and could ask one of the maths professors.
					
				 
				
						
														
					
												I am not positive exactly what you are asking, but if you are trying to represent a number raised to the zero power as factors, as you have above for non-zero powers, you cannot.  A number raised to the power of zero is simply defined to be equal to 1.
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												Hope this is what you're looking for.  I know i saw the answer to this before, but forgot what it looked like, but this is how i would write it.
(-K)^2 = (-K)^1 * (-K)^1 = (-k)^(1+1) = k ^2
(-k)^3 = (-k) ^1 * (-k) ^1 * (-k) ^1 = (-k) ^ (1 + 1 + 1) = -k ^3
(-k)^0 = (-k) ^1 * (-k) ^ (-1) = (-k)/(-k) = 1
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												what fachatta said, only without losing the exponents (2 and 3, respectively) on the first and second examples.
(-8)/(-8) = 1
(-8)/(-8) = [(-2)^3]/[(-2)^3] = (-2)^(3-3) = (-2)^0
So, (-2)^0 = 1
I find it helpful to use numbers before I use variables.  It helps prevent silly mistakes.
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												Yes, that is certainly correct.
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												patiodog wrote:
I find it helpful to use numbers before I use variables.  It helps prevent silly mistakes.
 
Yep. your explanation made the most sense-not that I'm not grateful to the others for their input.
											
 
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												Lifted straight from my (memory of) calculus notes, so I can take no credit.  The prof was a sadistic bastard, but his attention to basic principles was exemplary.
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												patiodog wrote: but his attention to basic principles was exemplary.
 
A lesson my chemistry professor last year still needs to learn. I even heard other academics questioning the way she imparted the information. I did well in the subject, but it was mainly due to some good sites I found on the web. Not because of the lectures.
											
 
					
				 
																
						
														
					
												With the best instructors, I never have to open the textbook.  With the worst, I learn everything from it.  Very good bacteriology prof right now -- actually uses the chalkboard instead of a computer.  Forces him to make the material intelligible and sequential, instead of a mass of information.