Good,Tennessee had these "Butler Laws' that made the Scopes trial inevitable and the fact that SCopes LOST didn't help until maybe 25 years later.
We hve a seres of USSC decisions that go bck to the 1950s nd continued till the 1980's THEN, the modern "Intelligent Design" story was cooked up by this old lawyer who wrote a book "Darwin n Trial". It became a manifesto for a newly emboldened bunch of anti-science clowns who wanted to divest themselves of any association with "Theistic Creationism".
They pulled ome really dumass moves like using a "Science textbook" named "OF PANDAS AND PEOPLE" in which the early editions used the word "Creationism or CREATION"
When the ID crowds took over the operations of the movement (After Creationism lost a USSC decision in 1987), the Discovery Institute decided to repaxkage "Of Pandas and People" by carefully editing the book and to remove all words like "Creationism" and replace with Intelligent Design. They failed because they missed the word in several places and, in one place, they didn't remove the od "Creationism" the book eiting algorithm merely blended Inetlligent Design nd Creationism nd "Evolved a new word" , something like" IntelliCreationGentDesignism. The Court case had dun with that one especially since the IDers sore that they hd research going into the new book.
We will have to ait until some group either decides to become a plaintiff and fight the state boards of Ed or, as in the case of Kansas, the IDesr became the plaintiff, trying this new approach wherein they stipulTE TO THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS snd make that the core of their arguments.
Bet you dint have this kind of fun in Korea