Tue 16 Sep, 2014 01:23 pm
The hypothesis: communicating, verbalizing or the gesture of an insult, is merely a utility, a utility to preserve some foundation of mind, the origin of which- prejudice.
The undermining agents of morality relies on function rather than means.
The end justify the means- as a sullying of the means.
The primordial thought or the cause of such thought in such action may be cause and effect, rather than moral codes.
The effect being what? Nothingness?
It may be opposed by the saying authority knows best, but on what account, specifically the knowledge of the subject is being questioned.
These are things which I demand of you precisely to look more closely at your moral valuations, why? Understanding and knowledge of the world.
Virtue the most expensive vice
"Virtue the most expensive vice"
But genuine Lederhosen and basement soundproofing doesn't come cheap, you know.
Light laugh is the initial response.
But your statement is an example of pure knowledge
Whatever it is that you're smoking or snorting, I wish you'd share it with the rest of us. (If it involves use of needles, count me out.)
There are two voices in your head:
Always listen to the softer voice, when you're a **** up.
Always listen to the louder voice, when you're all fixed up.
Room, this Universe has a purpose - our experience is based on that purpose; we do not live the animal we once were because we are evolving "i.e the purpose".