@farmerman,
farmerman, misquoting neo wrote:Quote: I believe it is necessary for a Creator to accomplish creative acts
Fight fairly, o fur faced farmer. For you have failed to include several words of my assertion.
Several important words, I might add.
If you go back to my response to Andy in this thread, (http://able2know.org/topic/227373-1#post-5501144) you may recall I said
Quote:If, indeed, there is a creator, He would be the source of all that we call natural law. In the end, all things would be explained.
I think this is a tight restriction on creative arguments, especially since I also said above that natural law and phenomena
Quote:will never be sufficient to prove the existence of a creator.
farmerman then wrote:Belief , without evidence, is the basis of modern religion
Rejection, without evidence, is the basis of modern science.
Far too sweeping a generalization for me to accept. I am not intending to advance the OP.
farmerman wrote:Your beliefs provide you a nice warm hidey hole from thinking too much. Such a position would kill any kind of scientific research
So the conclusion of your generalization is one must be an atheist in order to do scientific research. When did that happen?
After Newton?