@igm,
igm wrote:
I refer you to my opening post.
I just re-read your opening post. What was it I was supposed to see?
Quote:I can't talk to you about Buddhism because you haven't ever shown you would understand anything I have to say on the subject and you have no interest in it...
But you ARE talking to me about it...so why say that you "can't?"
Buddhism to me essentially is a gigantic appeal to authority. "The Buddha taught..." gets boring. Who the hell is the Buddha or you to claim that the Buddha is somehow "enlightened"...and has reasonable answers to difficult questions?
Quote:...other than the occasional misinformed snipe at Buddhists (you've mention no names in this thread and that say something about you Frank) that post on A2k.
I acknowledge that I do take an occasional shot at Buddhism...but compared with some of the stuff thrown here, I do not really get close to the line, let alone "over it." I laugh at some of the Christianity shots; I laugh at some 0f the atheists shots; I laugh at some of the agnostic shots...and I laugh at some of the Buddhist shots.
Lighten up. Some of the stuff is funny and clever.
The rest of this final comment of yours is almost unintelligable. What were you attempting to say?