@hawkeye10,
Had she maintained better, and more appropriate, conditions in her restaurant workplace, this lawsuit would not have come about.
The filing of this lawsuit was hardly an extortion attempt, it was a valid legal action by a former employee who felt she had been subjected to a rather noxious work environment, on a daily basis, and one which was in violation of laws, and one which Deen failed to address.
And the damage to Paula Deen was the result of the things she and her brother actually said during their sworn depositions for this suit, and her subsequent poor handling of the resultant negative publicity.
As an alleged small business owner, you, just like Deen, are responsible for the workplace conditions your employees are subjected to. Blatant sexism and sexual harassment are neither acceptable nor tolerable in a workplace, and the employer is obligated and responsible for correcting and stopping such practices when they occur. Deen failed to do that.
This case was settled, by mutual agreement, because Deen could not risk letting this matter go to trial. She gave the plaintiff in this suit whatever was needed in order to end it now, and that likely included an amount of money that will remain undisclosed, as will other details of the settlement.
Deen is the victim of nothing except her own shoddy business practices--which included letting her brother's abominable workplace behavior go unchecked--and her own statements. And she just paid the price for not being a better employer and business owner.
How Deen's business associates and contractors reacted to these revelations about her was entirely up to them. That most of them decided to cut her loose, was a decision they were entitled to make.