@BillRM,
Quote:Here judge is a survey where this child had admitted that he or she is a drug user and therefore an out of control minor in need of the courts taking charge of his or her life at least until the child is 18 years old.
Your understanding of PINS (persons in need of supervision) petitions, why they are needed, the criteria for issuing them, and how they are used, appears extremely distorted. So is your understanding of the definition of an "out of control" minor, if you think that term can be appropriately applied to a child who has done nothing more than admit to some past drug use on a school survey questionnaire, and that a PINS declaration by a Family Court judge would result from that.
But, since this is an irrelevant tangent that you raised in this thread, I'm simply going to suggest you better educate yourself regarding the reality of what you are talking about.
Quote:Minors do not have the same level of protections that an adult does.and it all for their "own" good!!!!!!!!!!!
As far as legal protections in Family Court, since you are referencing PINS petitions, minors have Law Guardians assigned to represent their interests and rights, which is the same sort of legal protection afforded to an adult who is involved in a court proceeding.
Quote: That so call drug use study could result in great harm to individual children futures who was given little choice about taking part in such a study and when an adult teacher try to informed them of the danger and that they did not need to take part he was punish for doing so.
Again, you are presenting distorted information. The school survey was not "a drug use study"--it was an SEL assessment survey, and, of the 34 questions, only about 3 or 4 pertained to any past substance use, and, in the scoring, the answers became part of the total Negative Affect scale, which also reflected the strength of "risk factors" such as anxiety, depression, bullying, etc.
The children did have a choice about participating in the survey--their participation was not mandatory, and they were not threatened with any consequences if they did not participate, and some children chose not to participate. And, the children weren't under any penalty of perjury, so they weren't being compelled to be honest in their survey responses either. In addition, the child's parent had the option of opting the child out of the survey.
And, if you read the copy of the actual reprimand that was sent to the teacher, that wasn't exactly why he was disciplined. And, after considerable searching, I have yet to find a valid legal opinion stating that the children would have, or might have, faced possible criminal consequences for any answers given on that particular school survey. In addition, the school stated there would be no disciplinary action taken by them against the students for any survey response.
I'll echo the view that you don't know what the hell you're talking about.