@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:No, to defend himself from being "stalked" by an apparent gun freak...
1. Rex: there is
NOTHING rong with stalking anyone.
It is not a defensive event.
It is perfectly lawful, decent, honorable n admirable,
applied to render
anti-burglary surveillance in a naborhood
that had problems with that.
2. There is nothing "freak"-ish about carrying guns.
That is one of our fundamental,
enumerated rights in the Bill of Rights.
RexRed wrote:Zimmerman is CURRENTLY being investigated
OK, there is no harm in
INVESTIGATING, Zimmy, U, or me.
So What??
RexRed wrote:for allegedly threatening his estranged wife with a gun...
Anyone can
ALLEGE that U threatened her with 3 guns. So what ??
RexRed wrote:It is NOW established that Zimmerman has problems with guns
and in time these problems are likely to get worse...
Your assertion is
FALSE.
That has
not been established (except that he has a problem
in getting back the gun that Holder stole from him).
RexRed wrote:I have always abhorred guns and violence, all of my life...
Uh-huh; not to get all rhetorical on u,
but I abhorred the absence of access to guns, for the first 7 years of my life.
David