20

# Does the UNIVERSE have a boundary or OUTER LIMIT?

Jpsy

1
Thu 28 Nov, 2013 03:25 am
@hitchhiker,
Quote:
Problem is we keep thinking in terms of space and time as seperate enties but they are connected somehow. According to special relativity given two events seperated by a distance d and a time t there is an interval that seperates them. This interival is given by square root ( d*d - t*t ). The wird thing is that this interval is the same regardless of who looks at the events and how fast they are traveling.

can you explain this a little better please. I'm not following it.
0 Replies

Setanta

1
Thu 28 Nov, 2013 05:34 am
Hitchhiker has not posted in these fora in more than nine years. I suspect you won't be getting an answer.
0 Replies

spendius

1
Thu 28 Nov, 2013 05:58 am
@Jpsy,
Quote:
If you travel on the surface of the balloon you can go around and around for infinity but never reach a boundary.

In what medium does the balloon float?
Jpsy

1
Sat 30 Nov, 2013 03:40 am
@spendius,
That's a good question? If our universe is finite, like the balloon analogy suggests, what is outside our universe? I'd love to hear some physicists ideas on that. Does anyone have Stephen Hawking's email address?

1. nothing, our universe is all that there is (even though its finite)
2. Our universe is infinite (in which case there are major flaws with the balloon analogy)
Interesting quote: "If the universe is infinite, it would also contain an infinite amount of matter. In this case, literally every possible arrangement of matter is present an infinite number of times. There are an infinite number of Earths out there, if we look far enough afield, some drastically different from ours, some virtually identical, some literally identical. Actually, there would be an infinite number of every one of the infinite possible Earths. As to what’s outside this universe, well, there’s obviously nothing beyond an infinite border." Mind boggling.
3."then there are the multiverse explanations. These postulate that the universe split off after the Big Bang into everything from bubbles to sheets. Our universe is just one of many, possibly a finite number or possibly infinite. In this conception, what’s “outside” our universe is simply another universe. It could have identical physical laws to our own home, or have completely different ones. Everything from gravity to the strong nuclear force could be different, leading to a reality that could behave differently in fundamental ways"

-But then your question still has relevance; what medium fills the space between these universes?

Cosmologists have the best jobs. They get paid to sit around and think about this crazy stuff. It makes me realize how much my job sucks. Sorry for the long reply.
spendius

1
Sat 30 Nov, 2013 04:31 am
@Jpsy,
That's okay Jpsy. It was a good one.

What about an infinite number of Jpsys providing that exact reply to an infinite number of spendiuses who have just had porridge and a banana for breakfast at an infinite number of siderial times.

Perhaps cosmologists ought to apologise for stealing candy off taxpayers.
0 Replies

Romeo Fabulini

1
Sat 30 Nov, 2013 06:37 am
Quote:
Equus said: If infinite stars existed outward in time and space to infinity, we would be able to see their light, even as the tiniest of pinpricks in the night sky. The night should be a solid mass of light from an infinite number of stars and galaxies shining light toward us from infinite time. The night is NOT a solid mass of light. Therefore, the cosmos is finite.

But what if the furthest stars are travelling away from us so fast in the expanding universe that their light is red-shifted into the invisible spectrum and we can't therefore see them?
0 Replies

Setanta

1
Sat 30 Nov, 2013 06:54 am
Equus has not posted in years and years. I suspect you won't be getting an answer to your silly question.
0 Replies

Romeo Fabulini

1
Sat 30 Nov, 2013 10:30 am
Now I come to think of it, I read a short article by Isaac Asimov or Arthur C. Clarke some years ago in which he said something like- "If the universe wasn't expanding, the night sky would be a dazzling white sheet composed of stars with no black spaces between them and we'd all be dead with the heat given off by all those countless stars."
0 Replies

sobu m varkey

1
Sat 3 Oct, 2015 02:12 pm
@Bibliophile the BibleGuru,
i think our technological programs should concentrate on traveling space in the speed of light years. may be this will works with black holes.
0 Replies

1
Thu 22 Oct, 2015 01:29 am
@marcuslangford,
it is theorized that there is edge of universe and that edge is "no space and time". But just imagin that What is "no time and space zone"? Its the most simple answer of most complicated question, does the universe has some boundry?
0 Replies

### Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake