2
   

The Mexicans

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 06:03 pm
EB, bein' in Tejas an' all, you may already know the story, but if not, you might be interested to read up on James Bowie (a despicable character really, but oddly likeable, as well) and his relations to the Spanish-speaking population of San Antonio de Bejar. Also read about Juan Seguine, and the Tejas war of independence. Fascinatin' stuff . . .

Again, my thanks for this thread.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 06:36 pm
It has been a long time ago, but I have read about Bowie and I share your opinion of him.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 06:49 pm
spending a few days gathering info on the Colorado San Luis Valley and the land grant robbery that continues to this day. will post what I can put together. (if the mexicans would just shut up and go away WE can have the water)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 06:58 pm
Of marginal interest is that Bowie apparently picked up a fair fluency in Spanish rather early in his life, long before he fled to Tejas and married Ursula Veramendi. After some desultory slave smuggling in cahoots with Jean and Pierre Lafitte, he hit upon the scheme of forging land grants alleged to have been issued at the behest of Galvez, who had been the Spanish governor of Louisiana before its sale to the United States (and for whom Galveston--Galvez Town--was named). However, only marginally literate when it came to writing English, as it was, his documents in Spanish aroused the suspicion of Federal land agents who didn't necessarily write Spanish at all, but who were familiar with the real mccoy. When a federal judge voided all of his claims in Arkansas, he decided to get out of Dodge, which is how he eventually ended up in San Antonio, and meet the lovely Ursula.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 09:38 pm
Mexicans in Nebraska
By Dr. Ralph F. Grajeda


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The history of the Mexican people in the United States is unique among the various peoples who have immigrated to this country. In a sense it can be said that the first Mexicans did not come to this country, but that this country came to them. The United States, through its war with Mexico, extended its boundaries in 1848 to include a territory almost the size of present-day Mexico, in which lived approximately 100,000 Spanish-speaking people-most of them in the five southwestern states: Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, California, and Colorado.

The majority of Mexican Americans living today in the Midwest, however, are descendants of parents and grandparents who were part of two massive migration waves occurring since 1900: the first from 1900 to 1920, and the second from 1920 to 1930. One scholar estimates that between 1900 and 1920, the number of Mexicans immigrating to the United States equaled one tenth of the total population of Mexico.1


Victoria de Ortiz came to Nebraska with her family around 1915, having been driven from their home by political turmoil. This photograph, showing her with her year-old son, Carlos, was featured in an article about her in the Lincoln Star, dated September 26, 1920. [Nebraska State Historical Society RG3357PH]

Very few Mexicans lived in the Central Plains states prior to 1900. According to an early study of Mexican immigration to the United States, there were only seventy-one Mexicans living in Kansas in 1900, and twenty-seven in Nebraska. By 1910 the Mexican immigrant population had increased enormously to 9,429 in Kansas, and 3,611 in Nebraska.2

This growth in population can be understood in light of far-reaching and complementary changes occurring in both Mexico and the United States. In one country these changes "pushed" people out; in the other the changes "pulled" them in.

The powerful event in Mexico that pushed people to the north was, of course, the Mexican Revolution, which during the period of 1910 to 1920 caused an extraordinary amount of suffering, upheaval, and confusion. Causes of revolution are always multiple and complex. As these causes are distilled to the daily life conditions of common people, however, they reduce themselves to simple and pronounced suffering.

The Mexican Revolution began in 1910, but its root causes had existed in the country for decades. The Porfirio Diaz dictatorship in Mexico (a period that lasted thirty-one years, twenty-seven of them consecutive) brought about peace, prosperity, and opportunity, but only for a select few-and that at the expense of the peasants, the workers, and the poor. At the end of the Diaz regime in 1910, probably less than three percent of the total rural population owned any land at all. There were 834 hacendados (land owners) and approximately nine million landless peasants living under a miserable debt peonage. Of the 834 hacendados, fifteen owned more than 100,000 acres each; the hacienda of San Blas in the state of Coahuila, for example, contained almost a million acres. Despite higher prices of basic necessities, the income of the peon in 1910 was about the same as a hundred years earlier.

That revolution is often described as a peasant civil uprising, in protest of the existing economic and social conditions pressing, for the most part, on the working classes, the poor, the campesinos. With the actual beginning of the armed conflict, living conditions for many became intolerable. Many became participants in the conflict. Many-lacking for work, for food, for medical services-responded as people always have under desperate living conditions: they fled their place of birth in search of those most basic needs without which life cannot be sustained, let alone be designated as human.

The major attracting force that "pulled" the Mexican immigrant to the north was the economic development in the southwestern part of the United States at this same time, and its corresponding need for cheap labor. The latter part of the nineteenth century saw the dramatic growth of agricultural enterprises and railroad construction in the Southwest. Demands of New England cotton mills, New York garment manufacturers, and the export market stimulated cotton growing in Texas in this period. The Reclamation Act of 1902 and the construction in 1904 of the St. Louis, Brownsville, and Mexican Railways encouraged ranchers in the lower Rio Grande Valley to create huge irrigation projects to grow table vegetable crops that could be shipped to large metropolitan areas on the new railroads' refrigerator cars.3

Also, in 1897 the U.S. Congress imposed a 75 percent tax on the importation of foreign sugar, thus encouraging the development of the U.S. sugar beet industry. Hence, by 1906, sugar beet acreage in the U.S. had more than tripled from the 135,000 acres planted in 1900. By 1920 that acreage had increased to 872,000, with the Great Plains region (which includes the North Platte Valley in Wyoming and western Nebraska) producing 64 percent of the total crop grown in the U.S. From 1923 to 1932 Nebraska ranked second in the U.S., behind Colorado, in annual sugar beet acreage (74,000 acres), and first in the nation in yield per acre (12.7 tons).4 The increased need for beet laborers, which these developments required, were met by the regular and methodical recruiting of Mexican agricultural workers. Additionally, many Mexicans, on their own initiative, entered the U.S. during this period, legally and otherwise.

The first of the Mexican railroad section-hands responded to railroad recruiters and crossed the border at El Paso in 1900. Living in boxcars, they began to establish small boxcar and tent communities that since have become the community barrios throughout the Southwest and the Midwest. By 1906 several carloads of workers a week were moving into southern California, establishing colonias, and then reloading for movement to locations in Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Kansas, and Nebraska. In 1908, 16,000 Mexicans were recruited in El Paso alone for railroad work. By 1910, 2,000 every month were crossing the border for railroad work.5
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 09:39 pm
Mexicans in Nebraska
By Dr. Ralph F. Grajeda


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The history of the Mexican people in the United States is unique among the various peoples who have immigrated to this country. In a sense it can be said that the first Mexicans did not come to this country, but that this country came to them. The United States, through its war with Mexico, extended its boundaries in 1848 to include a territory almost the size of present-day Mexico, in which lived approximately 100,000 Spanish-speaking people-most of them in the five southwestern states: Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, California, and Colorado.

The majority of Mexican Americans living today in the Midwest, however, are descendants of parents and grandparents who were part of two massive migration waves occurring since 1900: the first from 1900 to 1920, and the second from 1920 to 1930. One scholar estimates that between 1900 and 1920, the number of Mexicans immigrating to the United States equaled one tenth of the total population of Mexico.1


Victoria de Ortiz came to Nebraska with her family around 1915, having been driven from their home by political turmoil. This photograph, showing her with her year-old son, Carlos, was featured in an article about her in the Lincoln Star, dated September 26, 1920. [Nebraska State Historical Society RG3357PH]

Very few Mexicans lived in the Central Plains states prior to 1900. According to an early study of Mexican immigration to the United States, there were only seventy-one Mexicans living in Kansas in 1900, and twenty-seven in Nebraska. By 1910 the Mexican immigrant population had increased enormously to 9,429 in Kansas, and 3,611 in Nebraska.2

This growth in population can be understood in light of far-reaching and complementary changes occurring in both Mexico and the United States. In one country these changes "pushed" people out; in the other the changes "pulled" them in.

The powerful event in Mexico that pushed people to the north was, of course, the Mexican Revolution, which during the period of 1910 to 1920 caused an extraordinary amount of suffering, upheaval, and confusion. Causes of revolution are always multiple and complex. As these causes are distilled to the daily life conditions of common people, however, they reduce themselves to simple and pronounced suffering.

The Mexican Revolution began in 1910, but its root causes had existed in the country for decades. The Porfirio Diaz dictatorship in Mexico (a period that lasted thirty-one years, twenty-seven of them consecutive) brought about peace, prosperity, and opportunity, but only for a select few-and that at the expense of the peasants, the workers, and the poor. At the end of the Diaz regime in 1910, probably less than three percent of the total rural population owned any land at all. There were 834 hacendados (land owners) and approximately nine million landless peasants living under a miserable debt peonage. Of the 834 hacendados, fifteen owned more than 100,000 acres each; the hacienda of San Blas in the state of Coahuila, for example, contained almost a million acres. Despite higher prices of basic necessities, the income of the peon in 1910 was about the same as a hundred years earlier.

That revolution is often described as a peasant civil uprising, in protest of the existing economic and social conditions pressing, for the most part, on the working classes, the poor, the campesinos. With the actual beginning of the armed conflict, living conditions for many became intolerable. Many became participants in the conflict. Many-lacking for work, for food, for medical services-responded as people always have under desperate living conditions: they fled their place of birth in search of those most basic needs without which life cannot be sustained, let alone be designated as human.

The major attracting force that "pulled" the Mexican immigrant to the north was the economic development in the southwestern part of the United States at this same time, and its corresponding need for cheap labor. The latter part of the nineteenth century saw the dramatic growth of agricultural enterprises and railroad construction in the Southwest. Demands of New England cotton mills, New York garment manufacturers, and the export market stimulated cotton growing in Texas in this period. The Reclamation Act of 1902 and the construction in 1904 of the St. Louis, Brownsville, and Mexican Railways encouraged ranchers in the lower Rio Grande Valley to create huge irrigation projects to grow table vegetable crops that could be shipped to large metropolitan areas on the new railroads' refrigerator cars.3

Also, in 1897 the U.S. Congress imposed a 75 percent tax on the importation of foreign sugar, thus encouraging the development of the U.S. sugar beet industry. Hence, by 1906, sugar beet acreage in the U.S. had more than tripled from the 135,000 acres planted in 1900. By 1920 that acreage had increased to 872,000, with the Great Plains region (which includes the North Platte Valley in Wyoming and western Nebraska) producing 64 percent of the total crop grown in the U.S. From 1923 to 1932 Nebraska ranked second in the U.S., behind Colorado, in annual sugar beet acreage (74,000 acres), and first in the nation in yield per acre (12.7 tons).4 The increased need for beet laborers, which these developments required, were met by the regular and methodical recruiting of Mexican agricultural workers. Additionally, many Mexicans, on their own initiative, entered the U.S. during this period, legally and otherwise.

The first of the Mexican railroad section-hands responded to railroad recruiters and crossed the border at El Paso in 1900. Living in boxcars, they began to establish small boxcar and tent communities that since have become the community barrios throughout the Southwest and the Midwest. By 1906 several carloads of workers a week were moving into southern California, establishing colonias, and then reloading for movement to locations in Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Kansas, and Nebraska. In 1908, 16,000 Mexicans were recruited in El Paso alone for railroad work. By 1910, 2,000 every month were crossing the border for railroad work.5

continued

http://www.nebraskahistory.org/lib-arch/whadoin/mexampub/mexicans.htm
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 09:56 pm
MEXICANS are among the newest residents in Canada. They began to arrive in this country in the 1950s in very small numbers. Over the years, the number of immigrants has steadily increased, particularly from the 1970s on, and they now represent an interesting cross section of the Mexican population: urban and rural dwellers of various social and economic backgrounds. Significant Mexican immigration began with the coming of a cadre of professionals, managers, technicians, and students studying at Canadian universities, largely city folk from Mexico City, Puebla, Guadalajara, San Luis Potosi, and Acapulco. Like the many highly qualified immigrants from other countries, they left their homeland, often with families in tow, to obtain better income,job satisfaction, and career mobility.



The migration or immigration of Mexican Mennonites occurred in a different and remarkable way. Between 1920 and 1940, a number of Canadian Mennonites left their self-contained world of agriculture here and moved to northern Mexico. During this period, a certain amount of return migration also took place. Drought and economic hardship were some of the prime reasons for many Mexican-born descendants of the original migrants to move back to Canada between the mid-1980s and the early 1990s.

According to the 1996 census, there were at that time 23,295 people of Mexican descent in Canada. The highest proportions can be found in Ontario (8,210) and British Columbia (5,560), followed by Quebec (5,195), and Alberta (2,455). The main destinations were this country's major urban centres and metropolitan areas.
http://collections.ic.gc.ca/heirloom_series/volume7/countries/mexico.html
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 10:12 pm
Go Edgar! Just starting to browse here....
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 10:32 pm
In Kensington Market on Spadina in T.O., there are both Mexican stores and Argentine stores, at which one can purchase the bric-a-brac, clothing, music and specialty foods which will remind one of home in Mexico or Argentina.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2004 08:07 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexicans
This is a list of famous Mexicans.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Apr, 2004 06:36 pm
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 08:34 am
I thought that this post needed to be bumped up, and I'll do so every day. Its importance isn't restricted to a few days in the news.

(Did you read 'The Tortilla Curtain in the end, Edgar?)

0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 09:10 am
I have been so disrupted by events that I haven't even searched a copy. I still intend to make good. My work schedule, which keeps me as active as any 18 year old boy, exhausts me. Then I have deadlines for my short stories, plus fighting off ill effects of some large tumors on my legs - It's almost impossible for at least a few more months. I appreciate your interest in the thread. I have always been close to Mexicans in one way or another, having lived in the same poor neighborhoods as a child and working with many in new housing construction. At age 20 I came close to marrying a Mexican (only close, because she couldn't accept my religious views). I have a grandson who is half Mexican, and he's the light of my life. I began this thread, partly because, despite all that close association, I am still ignorant in many ways.
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 11:28 am
Tumours? Good loins of the Earth, I never knew Sad. I hope that the worst is over, Edgar, and that, if you had treatment, it was effective. Like many people, I look up to you very much, and A2K wouldn't be the same without your contributions.

Whether anything is added to here or not, the thread's content should be discovered and recovered by everyone. O, if you want a copy of Tortilla, I can send mine over to you (the annotations can be ignored.)
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 02:00 pm
Are you talking online?
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 02:07 pm
Talking online on one of the messengers? Or talking about an online copy of the book?

0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 02:13 pm
book
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 02:20 pm
I don't have an online copy of the book, but I could type it up.

0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 04:04 pm
I think Amazon.com will have one. I appreciate the offer.
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Aug, 2004 04:45 am
No problem..

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How a Spoon Can Save a Woman’s Life - Discussion by tsarstepan
Well this is weird. - Discussion by izzythepush
Please Don't Feed our Bums - Discussion by Linkat
Woman crashes car while shaving her vagina - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Genie gets sued! - Discussion by Reyn
Humans Marrying Animals - Discussion by vinsan
Prawo Jazdy: Ireland's worst driver - Discussion by Robert Gentel
octoplet mom outrage! - Discussion by dirrtydozen22
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Mexicans
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 06/21/2025 at 02:36:23