…..what aspect of my theory troubles you
Nothing "troubles me",
Its just a feeling I get reading your postings. Maybe I should have said, "raises your hackles" or "suggests indignation"
I just fail to see ANYTHING that can be considered a theory in your last several threads
Sorry, here it is
You seem to want to have a much higher "C" with no regard to any limits…...Youve not given any examples of how your consideration of a higher "c"…..that allow us to use the present c…...See Im an applied guy…...
It's explained in that OP
….. that states quite clearly that you have a c of a higher velocity. Remember?
It's also explained quite clearly (so I think)
OOPS Man, I apologize most profoundly, my mistake, forgive me, how could I have done that, it's terrible
Should be 186,282 mps
a radio wave (c) being a constant of ONE value (it doesnt vary.
No, Yes, Farm, I fully understand that. I presume you mean a radio wave's velocity
but I think my position will become clear when you read the summary
you have to admit that theyre pretty elegant and simply elegant.
Yes Einstein's relativity is very elegant. Mine too as you will learn if you read it
Forgive me Man, couldn't resist but why is it you seem so fractious this afternoon
Im not fractious at all.
No, yes, sorry, forgive me, neither am I. Not a bit. I'm not angry at all. I'm not
, I tell you, I'M NOT
Im actually smiling…...how little real thought youve given to the subject.
Alas alack, I like your
Sorry Man, couldn't resist
We periodically…….with claims of "new and exciting theories…….Usually theyre just someone 's "virtual narcissis"
That's me, hopeless narcissist
Id suggest you read that book I recommended
Thank you again for that link, again you've strengthened My Id
"bandwagonning" or "bandwagon piling' are infrequently used as verbs. i just eschew the commonplace in English usage