Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Craven - If I "painted" in terms of appeasement and standing firm, and you expressed the opinion that the Spain had, indeed, stood firm, then it follows that you infered my 'Painting" to have been done on the canvass of Spain.
When you say it you claim it's not an inference to Spain so there's simply no way I'll accept your arbitrary distinction that when I say it it is.
I took care to couch it in the exact manner I wished to word it, and further speculation about inference will have to continue without me.
Quote:That by pulling Spanish troops out of Iraq (assuming they go through with their stated intent) they will have allowed the terrorists who attacked their country to feel victorious and, likely, emboldened to strike elsewhere for similar victories.
This is very simplictic reasoning, and Al Quaeda is already trying to exploit it.
They released a statement saying how much they love Bush as a president hoping to capitalize on the wariness simplistic mindsets feel when they exhibit exhuberance.
Why simplistic? Because they lack the capacity to realize that terrorists of this ilk almost always act victorious. When they don't, it's a "righteous rage" and they are poised on the brink of victory.
They are demented, and those who worry too much about how they feel have an odd way of looking at things.
They suggest that this emboldens them and motivates them, all the while ignoring that these types are past the need for motivation and even in the face of delibating loss they press forward in their dementia.
