Theory of IDEOGENY

There is nothing wrong with categorization of anything so long as there is a sound basis for alleging the categories. You, however, just state that these categories exist, and do so without substantiation. People have nothing to fear from notional descriptions for which there is no foundation. Once again, you are peddling ipse dixit contentions, not describing irrefutable categories.

Theory of ideogeny is based on my inside experience applied to the others' behavior logically.

Try observing yourself (its not easy) and notice from that "experience" the myth of a "unified self". Categorization is meaningless if it implies prediction, since different facets of "self" are evoked by different contexts.

Help, I'm steppin' into the twilight zone
Place is a madhouse, feels like being cloned
My beacon's been moved under moon and star
Where am I to go now that I've gone too far?

What is the purpose of the Theory of ideogeny?

- Sort ideas according to their relationship to the basic types and degree of association.

- Personality traits are reduced to a letter and a number that represent and explain their nature.

- Using the Theory of ideogeny we obtain a deeper understanding of how our minds work.

THE PSYCHE

Psyche (from Greek, soul) is the set of basic features as a platform to a person's behavior. The PSYCHE is the human operating system.

Theories of personality (from the Greek persona meaning actors mask) are two a penny, especially those with pretty pictures of four quadrants ! Their "explanatory" power is zero from a scientific point of view, but they are sometimes used as functionally shared markers in dialogues in handling people by salesmen, therapists etc. Note that Freudian patients dream Freudian dreams... Jungian patients dream Jungian dreams....etc,etc.

Your insistent repetition here, combined with your phrase "whats wrong with..." merely indicate your ignorance of these issues.

No one has the absolute truth, but everybody think they have it. if I have the truth everything else is pseudoscience.

WHAT ARE WE REALLY?

For some disciplines and social sectors we are:

1 - Statistics ....................... code
2 - Medicine ....................... patient
3 - Sociology ...................... individual
4 - Politics ......................... one vote
5 - Government ................... taxpayers
6 - Economy ....................... employee
7 - Computer science ............ user
8 - Business ....................... customer
9 - Religion ........................ believers or wicked
10 - Biology ........................ organism
11 - Philosophy ................... subject
12 - Theory of ideogeny ......... psyche or soul.

The psyches can be: pure, useful, diseased and polluted. The pure psyches are healthy, useful and without any contamination. The useful psyches are performing a work for the benefit for themselves and for other people. The diseased psyches have some clinical profile. The polluted psyches are performing a work for the benefit for themself, but in detriment to others.

We are all of the above, but without soul or psyche are nothing, we are dead.

No..this is nothing to do with "truth" and certainly not "absolute truth". (which is delimited to religion). Unless you can provide evidence of the social functionality of your system beyond your egocentric assessment of it, you are basically producing illustrated word salad. Consider, for example that nobody these days takes Freudian psychology seriously as "an explanatory" or "truthful" account in any universal sense. They merely talk of the origins of its social functionality as a vehicle for dialogue between neurotic middle class Viennese and their therapists.

The evidence of my theory is private, It's in the mind of people. Tell me what you think, feel and understand and I'm going to tell you who you are.

Pretentious rubbish ! You don't know that, and are unlikely to establish that with the word salad you have produced so far. All you are doing is proposing an egocentric method of "handling people" that you think works for you. Even celebrated phenomenologists like Husserl, who avoided "an external reality" adhered to the principle of social agreement to substantiate his theories about the operations of "mind".

On second thoughts, you probably haven't even tested it for yourself! You are more likely to be here on a self-promotion exercise looking for someone to talk to.

I asked: Tell me what you think, feel and understand and I'll to tell you who you are.
You answered: Pretentious rubbish!

MENTAL LANGUAGE: DIFFERENTIAL SIGNS

Ordinary language is basically oral.
Punctuation marks and special symbols are used in the Theory of ideogeny (TI) to establish specific ideas. You can use any sign except the hyphen ( - ) and parentheses ( ) ) that already have a role in TI. You can not use numbers either.

Examples: S: S; S' S" S​​/ S\ S> S< S. S, S! S? S= S# S^ (use in that order).
Each of these sensings is different of the other. They can use the numbers (3, 2​​, 1) to establish the degree of association. S:3 S;2 S'1

S: can be a table, S; a chair and S' a book. In front of the object.
S): can be the representation of a table, S); a chair and S)' a book. In the absence of the object.
8: can be an accident, 8; a robbery and 8' attacked by a lion.

Examples: C: C; C' C" C/

C: can be table, C; chair and C' book. The concept.
O: can be believe in God, O; in ghosts and O' in the deads.
Q: may be the intuition of infinity, Q; of the space and Q' of the time.

Examples: A: A; A' A" A/

A: may be interest in reading, A; interest in playing some sports and A' love for a person.

Examples: V: V; V' V​​" V​​/

V: can be altruism, V; faith and V' justice. (social attitudes).

I note you are (frantically ?) spamming the forums with this stuff. That's often the sign of an unemployable academic. I can't believe you promoting behaviorism and yet playing with language given its demolition by generative grammarians like Chomsky. Forget the mathematical mystification. It's a smokescreen for drivel.

Hahahahahaha
Don't make me laugh. You are the dark side of the forum.

MENTAL ABILITIES

- CALCULATION skill: 3C# is a number, a mathematical entity. The 3 is high association.

- LOGIC skill: 3C> is an argument or conclusion.

- DRAWING skill: 3S)? is a visual image.

- MUSICAL skill: 3S)! is an acoustic image.

- INTUITION: Intuition is the equivalent of the sensing, but immaterial or imperceptible things by the senses. 3Q: is the infinity.

- INTERPERSONAL skill: 3A= is the sympathy with others.

- INTRAPERSONAL Skill: 3S^ is the knowledge of oneself, introspection.

- The understanding of the Theory of ideogeny is a LINGUISTIC skill.

I should stick to the "logic" of your favorite Back to the Future if I were you. At least it's entertaining !

It seems you've been going through my blogs.

www.humanistic-behaviorism.blogspot.com

Welcome to others too.

Yes. It is interesting to see that your (few)respondents have also identified you as an incoherent bullshit merchant on an ego trip.

Stop criticizing so much, it doesn't have sense reading your posts. You're in my ignore list.

Hah, take that!
I'm on Fresco's side.

Big deal!!!