13
   

Louisiana Private Schools Teach Loch Ness Monster Is Real In Effort To Disprove Evolution Theory

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 06:06 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
a fact gos on whether you "believe it or not",
When a fact is given enough evidence and proof that its being fits within a standard theory
Belief is irrelevant.
It may be irrelevant,
but the belief EXISTS, whether it is relevant or not.
For instance, I 've heard that respected scientists
stoutly declared that heavier-than-air flight was IMPOSSIBLE
shortly b4 the Wright Bros. Kitty Hawk flight.
Thay BELIEVED what thay said.
Thay were not trying to disgrace themselves
in front of the world and in front of their colleagues.


farmerman wrote:
We know how fermentation occurs via yeast, we dont "believe in it",
The hell u DON'T!
If I denied fermentation, u 'd call me a liar.

( Yeah, I know that u 'd prove it,
but u 'd call me a liar anyway and u'd STILL believe in fermentation. )



farmerman wrote:
Belief is a mere tool, absent evidence.

Thats how it is in science

A yeast will ferment sugar whether or not there is a mind to "Believe" it.

Youve confused the popular context of "belief"

Its sorta risen to the level of what a theory is in science.
Most people think that theory means mere speculation, it doesnt.
Fermentation happens, I try to understand how it does all that via the intercession of yeast.

Think about my sig line. Its actually true that a mechanism of a theory is first "Believed,"
however, when its emplaced within the theory, its a fact.
Facts are still believed or dismissed.

farmerman wrote:
LEMME put it into something you can relate to

You "believe" that the present dministration is trying to take your guns, you dont know that is fact nor do you understand how.

You KNOW that you own a gun (or two). I believe that you own a gun because I have no further evidence but your say so.
I know that he 'd rob me
of my guns IF HE WERE ABLE TO DO IT, BUT HE CAN'T.

A man's reality can be self-defined, according to his belief.
Consider hypnotists who 've had volunteers from their audiences
mount the stage and (in a state of hypnosis) be told that a coin
resting on their hands is red-hot, with resultant blisters.

The War Dept. has sent false reports of death
to soldiers' mothers at home, who believe it
until the alleged casualty disproves it, showing that he remains intact.

U can miscalculate your arithmetic
and believe a false reality based upon that error,
until it has been identified.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 07:32 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Facts are still believed or dismissed.


I am curious what your opinion is of those the dismiss facts because they don't fit with what they believe.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 07:42 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Have you heard of 'intelligent falling?'

The Einstein concepts challenged Newton's theory of gravity. Gravity, like evolution is only a theory, so why not test it out?

(I'm not telling you to do something stupid and dangerous btw)
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 08:11 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
U can miscalculate your arithmetic
and believe a false reality based upon that error,
until it has been identified
youve sorta made my point here Dave. You should listen to yourself in rebuttal more often. Once in a while you trip over truths and assimilate them unknowingly
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 09:02 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
The Einstein concepts challenged Newton's theory of gravity.


Newton never had or published any sort of a THEORY of gravity, Poop, he simply described how it worked.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 10:13 am
@gungasnake,
You are so very stupid.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 10:47 am
What Einstein published could at least be called a theory (even though it doesn't work) in that he at least tried to provide an answer as to WHY gravity operates the way that it does. Newton was just describing the way that gravity works.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 10:59 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation" The Moon orbits around the Earth. Since its size does not appear to change, its distance stays about the same, and hence its orbit must be close to a circle. To keep the Moon moving in that circle--rather than wandering off--the Earth must exert a pull on the Moon, and Newton named that pulling force gravity.

http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sgravity.htm

0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 11:05 am
@gungasnake,
Actually, Newton provided the math of how it works. But don't let your beliefs get in the way of reality gunga.
rosborne979
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 01:02 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
But don't let your beliefs get in the way of reality gunga.
It's a little late to be telling him that Wink
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 01:12 pm
@gungasnake,
Quote:
Newton never had or published any sort of a THEORY of gravity, he simply described how it worked

which is what any good theory does.
Im fraid that, when gungas head finally intercepts reality, it will be in the manner of the Reverend Bishop Wilberforce.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 01:17 pm
@farmerman,

Quote:
U can miscalculate your arithmetic
and believe a false reality based upon that error,
until it has been identified
farmerman wrote:
youve sorta made my point here Dave. You should listen to yourself in rebuttal more often.
Once in a while you trip over truths and assimilate them unknowingly
U appear to imply that this is
a new position of mine. I have always believed this.





David
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 01:20 pm
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:
just describing the way [something] works.

I'm pretty sure that's the whole point of science. Observe. Describe. Quantify. Test.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 03:16 pm
@izzythepush,
Very funny, Iz.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 03:17 pm
@rosborne979,
Key point, thanks for mentioning that.
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 03:44 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Clarke's Three Laws

1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.

2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.

3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke's_three_laws

Rap
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 04:14 pm
@DrewDad,
Quote:
Observe. Describe. Quantify. Test


Rinse, repeat if necessary
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 04:16 pm
@ossobuco,
Ta very much.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2012 08:48 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Actually, Newton provided the math of how it works.


That was descriptive math. Nothing about it told anybody WHY gravity worked the way it does or what was involved.

You want a realistic modern theory of gravity? This is about the best there is at the present time:

http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Th%E9ories/Ralph%20Sansbury%20-%20Gravitomagnetism%20and%20light.pdf

That's probably not the most up to date version of the thing, it's just what's turning up on google tonight.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2012 01:48 am
@parados,
DAVID wrote:
Facts are still believed or dismissed.
parados wrote:
I am curious what your opinion is of those the dismiss facts
because they don't fit with what they believe.
My opinion is disapproval of that criterion.





David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Kid wouldn't fight, died of injuries - Discussion by gungasnake
Public school zero tolerance policies. - Question by boomerang
Dismantling the DC voucher program - Discussion by gungasnake
Adventures in Special Education - Discussion by littlek
home schooling - Discussion by dancerdoll
Can I get into an Ivy League? - Question by the-lazy-snail
Let's start an education forum - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Educational resources on the cheap - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 10:44:13