@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:well thanks for the grammer lesson [shud be grammar]
I am usually supportive of good grammar because, for the most part (with very few exceptions)
grammar is competently grounded in
sound logic,
which is how, with the deft use of weapons, we rose to the
TOP
of
the food chain and how America got to the Moon. I think logic important.
Linkat wrote:kinda funny coming from some one
who doesn't use the conventional way of spelling
I'm trying to show the
faults
in some of the extant paradigm of spelling
(like adding UGH to the word: tho, and jabbing
Ls into wud, cud or shud)
that shud have been corrected but have been
NEGLECTED
by the educational establishment, whose members have been
complicit
in perpetuating these offenses against ease, against convenience
and against logic. Thay atavisticly cling to the old forms
that belong to ages when English was pronounced closer to its Germanic origins,
as it was in the days of Chaucer.
Enuf is enuf. Let 's fix it. I 'm trying to lead by example.
Linkat wrote:- but I did not ask for help on home work.
If u ever do,
I 'll be sympathetic to your plite (plight).
David