5
   

What is 'formlessness'?

 
 
Reply Sat 21 Apr, 2012 07:40 pm
can you define it? and what fields of study does it belong in?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 5 • Views: 1,388 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Sun 22 Apr, 2012 05:25 am
@comfyblanket,
cloud formations
JLNobody
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Apr, 2012 06:31 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Cloud formations have shape or form. Perhaps a fog that is surrounding me is more formless. And maybe we should define "formlessness" as a distinct object of perception that has no form or shape.
Trying to identify the "essential" nature of "formlessness" is putting the cart before the horse. I once tried to correct for this error by identifying a "puppy" with the hypothetical situation of one man asking another "How should we refer to a young dog?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Apr, 2012 06:31 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Cloud formations have shape or form. Perhaps a fog that is surrounding me is more formless. And maybe we should define "formlessness" as a distinct object of perception that has no form or shape.
Trying to identify the "essential" nature of "formlessness" is putting the cart before the horse. I once tried to correct for this error by identifying a "puppy" with the hypothetical situation of one man asking another "How should we refer to a young dog?
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Apr, 2012 09:10 pm
@JLNobody,
Quote:
Trying to identify the "essential" nature of "formlessness" is putting the cart before the horse.


...from your very own assumed judgement, what cart ? what horse ? "identifying" what that has no "essential" to it ? "A" that it is not A ? at best you get to multiply, not to exclude as you get 2 instead of one...
...if there is such a self consistent thing we phenomenally identify as "formlessness" without falling in a conceptual misunderstanding, such thing is exactly to report no the absence of shape but the presence of many shapes occurring as we observe "sharpness change"...
rockpie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2012 03:40 am
Off the top of my head, I'd go with 'that which cannot be either perceived or conceived'. Anything that exists (and I use that word without the etymological baggage) has form. At the very least on the atomic or sub-atomic level. So formlessness would have to be a complete lack of anything. Including thought about it.
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2012 01:45 pm
@rockpie,
Interesting!
0 Replies
 
33export
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2012 02:48 pm
@comfyblanket,
Quote:
what fields of study does it belong in


More than likely in abstract topology. Here's a good overview of the concept.
0 Replies
 
NoSuchThing
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2012 08:12 pm
Since all forms are formless if you magnify large enough, therefore formlessness is the essence of form. You should study Quantum Physics.
0 Replies
 
Krumple
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 03:34 am
@comfyblanket,
comfyblanket wrote:

can you define it? and what fields of study does it belong in?


I always figured things like, thoughts were formless. They seem to arrise from out of complete nothingness and flow like a stream back into the nothingness. Sure there are things that may spark an idea but they still seem to arrise from no where and also "return" to that same "place".
0 Replies
 
zDamien
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 06:06 am
@comfyblanket,
After death, the last formality will be filling out your death certificate. The last form having been filed, you're in the state of formlessness.
0 Replies
 
G H
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 12:08 pm
@comfyblanket,
Quote:
can you define it?

(a) Components or substance arranged into a pattern judged random -- not classifiable or identifiable as a standardized or documented shape / scheme.

(b) Extended but featureless uniformity devoid of discernable change to even indicate movement in space and time.

(c) Lack of space. No room for individuation and distinction to be mapped / manifested, for enabling separation while maintaining connection via extended relations that result in variable configurations. No room for featureless homogeneity, either.

Quote:
and what fields of study does it belong in?

Billy Mumy's cornfield (It's A Good Life, TZ). Non-consciousness studies. Post-life studies. Dreamless sleep studies. BS studies.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 01:24 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil Albuquerque wrote:

Quote:
Trying to identify the "essential" nature of "formlessness" is putting the cart before the horse.


...from your very own assumed judgement, what cart ? what horse ? "identifying" what that has no "essential" to it ? "A" that it is not A ? at best you get to multiply, not to exclude as you get 2 instead of one...
...if there is such a self consistent thing we phenomenally identify as "formlessness" without falling in a conceptual misunderstanding, such thing is exactly to report no the absence of shape but the presence of many shapes occurring as we observe "shapness change"...


...correction in blue...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What is 'formlessness'?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 04:42:59