Why I Called George Zimmerman a Murderer, and Why I Was Wrong

Hood did not succeed at getting any of its shells through Bismark's decks...

The German guns and their aiming systems were more accurate and getting munitions on target is what firepower is about.

Dance and and weasel all you want, it's obvious that you were peddling bullshit. The biggest fault was that Hood and Prince of Wales approached Bismarck and Prinz Eugen on the beam, thereby sacificing half their firepower in the rush to engage. I know of no evidence that the fire control systems of the Royal Navy were inferior to the German systems, that's mere ipse dixit on your part.

The fact remains that you shot your mouth of without knowing what you were talking about.

I'll ask again:

By the way, the more important thing here is not Gunga Dim's false analogy, it's that he offered in the vein of a stupid, cynical and callous crowing over the death of a young, who he does not know for a fact had assaulted Zimmerman. The only evidence we have that Martin assaulted Zimmerman is Zimmerman's claim to that effect--and given that he's facing a second degree murder charge, and very likely knew from the beginning that he might be charged with a crime, it's reasonable to consider him an untrustworthy witness.

Gunga has made this cynical and callous remark, this stupid remark, in my opinion because he is a typical sociopathic conservative who doesn't care that Matrin was killed, he just excited by a case of some clown using lethal force.

I said, if Martin had lived. Obviously nobody charges dead people with criminal activities.

Voting however is a different topic. Martin is now a good candidate for demoKKKrat party voter registration...

Yes a young man is now a statistic. Now the courts will prevail.

BTW, bub, this is Florida. This is a state where voters don't elect candidates, the State Supreme Court elects candidates. Consider this my topical Red Herring response.

Rap

No, you didn't. That's why I asked.

The context was clear enough from your own words:



I replied with a list of things he might have been charged with, again the context being clear.

Except those aren't my words. Some other Joe wrote that.

Joe's all look the same to me, and the context was still perfectly clear. Do you find being an idiot painful??

That was certainly uncalled for.

What Ive learnt from gunga (from several years of listening to his denials of science), is that he will just as easily lie and deny things that hed said just a few pages prior. SO his denial herein is well within his MO.

So is him calling Joe names. If you make him look like a fool (child's play), insults and name calling are his next and last resort.

then he disappears into the smoke while he looks up another racist or antiscience blurt.