Remember AIG starts with a Biblical Inerrancy assumption so anything that challenges your belief must be wrong. Science aint like that.
Weve gone through tens of modifications for radiometric dating, everything from siezing a LAMBDA function unique to the isotopes, the understanding of what "chrons" are.
Radiometric dating is repeatable, experimentally derived, and its strong;y verifiable by many many different "overlapping" methodologies (we can do non radiometric dating for relative qnd exact dating)
My suggestions are that you really read the developments and the methodology of radiometric dating before you try to offer what you think is correct or not.(I find it kind of lqughable that you are accepting "Answers in Genesis" a huckster site , and you dont ahve any idea what all the interrelationships among isotopic half lives have provided us in many of our tools and discoveries.
Error in isotope dating is about 0.2% to 1% of presented data.
A.P. Dickin's bookRadioactive isotope Geology (1995)
, is still a great text and its approachable and not full of all those "certainties" that AIG presumes are real.
If you doubt rad decay analyses (and all the isotope variations available), there are many other techniques such as
alpha track dating
Cosmogenic exposure dating
Optically STimulated Thermo
Youre playing in my court and Im a bit aghast that you folks dont EVER question from where all these other methods come from and how they were verified an how well they repeat etc etc. You just BUY into AIG because its Biblically supported. Im sorry, thats just not good enough. Many scientists had tried to underpin SCripture with findings and they were soon to discover that the erth is REALLY REALLY OLD. And we dont have any evidence of mammoth fossils from the Carboniferous or the Cambrian . All that says is that the fossils ARE NOT arranged by density but by ascending age strata.
There was an ENglish comedian who took the Creation"Science" crap apart in a skit where he reads Genesis and comments on it. Funny stuff.
One of Dawkins/Ham discussions was on Youtube and the question was asked of Dawkins
"How can you believe all this evolution stuff"??
"Cause it works" he replied. "Nothing that Creationists presewnt is a fact or can be evidenced "