1
   

Headscarves Blindfold a Government or Two

 
 
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 01:55 pm
Headscarves Blindfold a Government or Two
Julio Godoy - IPS 1/27/04

The French government has moved on from headscarves to political beards and invisible turbans. Political leaders in Germany are feeling inspired to follow suit. What is going on?

PARIS, Jan 26 (IPS) - A proposed French law to ban the wearing of religious symbols in schools and public buildings is turning rapidly into an international joke. It does not help France that some Germans want to repeat the French move.

The dispute began with headscarves but has not stopped there. In an attempt to explain that the French law does not target Muslims, French minister for education Luc Ferry told French parliament last week that Sikh turbans would have to be invisible under the law.

Ferry said also that the law would prohibit beards and bandanas if they can be interpreted as religious symbols.

"People can develop religious symbols starting from a certain hirsuteness," Ferry told parliament. And so beards and other hair-prominent styles must also be banned. Ferry has claims to a background in philosophy.

The proposed law will be debated in parliament next week, and a vote is due Feb. 4. Given the large government majority, the law is expected to go through.

All this follows a declaration by President Jacques Chirac last December that the government would pass a law to separate state from religion, a guiding principle of the French revolution of 1789.

The law aimed to ban the Muslim headscarf in schools after several girls insisted on wearing it in defiance of school regulations. But it sought to cover also the Jewish kippa and large crucifixes, to declare its secular character.

France is predominantly Catholic, but it is also home to some five million Muslims, about 600,000 Jews and several other religious minorities.

"I cannot believe that France has fallen into this debate only because of a piece of textile," leading commentator Maurice Druon wrote in the Le Figaro newspaper. "To transform this into a state debate, and even an international issue, is a record."

The proposed law sees the turban as the Sikh equivalent of the headscarf.. Tens of thousands of Sikhs in France plan to demonstrate against the government move Jan. 31.

"We will never take our turban off," Sikh spokesman Jasdev Singh Rai declared at a press conference.

"Some of our ancestors gave their lives for France in the first and second world wars," Rai told IPS later. "If a French authority would have asked them to take off the turban, our grandparents and parents would never have fought for France.."

About 25,000 people had demonstrated in Paris against the ban Jan. 17. Several thousands marched in other cities, though French Arabs are divided how far to confront the government.

Demonstrations against the proposed law have taken place also in several Arab countries, in Britain, the United States and even Indonesia.

Some French teachers say the law cannot be enforced. "France is making a fool of herself," says Jean-Yves Souben, principal of a public school in Saint Denis, 15 km north of Paris. "Are we going to ban t-shirts with pictures of Ernesto "Che" Guevara, the Palestinian keffiehs, and force people to eat pork against their will? This is ridiculous." Senior ministers have said the law is staining France's image abroad. Minister for foreign affairs Dominique de Villepin is reported to have said in a confidential government debate last week that the proposed ban has placed France in an untenable situation, particularly in the Arab world.

The foreign ministry later denied that De Villepin had used these terms. But it said he had emphasised the "need to make a particular effort to reduce misinterpretations in a certain number of countries."

A similar debate has been launched in Germany by the right-wing opposition led by the Christian Democratic Union. Monika Hohlmeier, education minister in the southern state Bavaria says banning the headscarf for teachers would be "a signal for parents that the school defends with absolute conviction the constitutional values of human dignity and gender equality."

Bishop Margot Kaessmann from Hanover called for a general ban on the Muslim headscarf in all public services. "The headscarf is often misused as a political symbol," Kaessmann argued. But he said that the carrying of a Christian crucifix, a Jewish star of David, or of the Islamic half moon cannot be forbidden. Commissioner for migration issues Marieluise Beck opposed the ban on constitutional grounds. "Those who call for a ban in the name of the German constitution obviously ignore the basic verdict given by the constitutional court," Beck said.

The German constitutional court asked federal states in October to pass a common law on the use of religious symbols in schools that would respect equality among all citizens regardless of their religion.

The debate has not touched Britain where many among about two million Muslims wear headscarves and no one looks twice. The British are watching the turmoil across the English Channel with some amusement.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 635 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
oldandknew
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 02:48 pm
Re: Headscarves Blindfold a Government or Two
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Headscarves Blindfold a Government or Two
Julio Godoy - IPS 1/27/04


The debate has not touched Britain where many among about two million Muslims wear headscarves and no one looks twice. The British are watching the turmoil across the English Channel with some amusement.




BBB --- there have been lots of reports on UK tv news channels about this.
If the UK tried to impose such laws, they'd be in serious trouble.
The UK is not exactly Utopia when it comes to race/religion relationships but for the most part, as you say, no one looks twice.
The UK is a highly multi cultural country, with just about every religion representented & nationality as well. We are tolerant of others views as long as they are within the law. We even put up with being bombed by the IRA without mass internment of all Irish people living here.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 03:13 pm
Speaking as a British Educationalist there seem to be three issues raised by the French dilemma.

1. From a philosophical point of view a "state" having the duty to promote harmony via the socialization process should have the right to impose secularism within "state schools."

2. From a pragmatic point of view a "state" takes secondary place to "tribalism" in the perceptions of its population.

3. The particular symbol (headscarf) under scrutiny by the French has both separatist and male chauvanist aspects, (the latter implying it has been imposed on the wearer who would covertly applaud its removal).

The British "solution" is one of political expediency where government money is available for separatist schools, and cultural diversity is encouraged in state schools. Despite this "enlightened" approach the result seems to be occasional racial violence and a worrying rise in the fortunes of the far right.
0 Replies
 
Ning
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 07:03 pm
Quote:
The debate has not touched Britain where many among about two million Muslims wear headscarves and no one looks twice.


I don't see why it would touch Britain. As far as I know, secularism is not written in british constitution for 200 years as it is in the french one. Separation of Chirch and State is the base of french republic since revolution in 1789. It's not a new law at all as many foreign people seem to believe.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Headscarves Blindfold a Government or Two
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 08:11:31