@Thomas,
Quote:Also, no acadamic assigns obscure texts to their students because they're obscure.
In the first course I ever took in graduate school, obscure texts got assigned to us for precisely this reason. The course was an introduction and history of the field, and as obscurantism was the reigning trend in our field from about the 1990s till about the mid-2000s, we were expected to be familiar with the style. We were definitely not encouraged to use it, at least not by this professor. At no point did he have any illusions that he was teaching us stuff that was going to revolutionize the field, and in fact he predicted that the obscurantist style was going to hit its expiration date very soon.
(He was right. Last month, at a conference, I witnessed a paper by a scholar who had previously been a prominent Adornian--and is still trying to be--and his presentation was a hopeless mess of jargon that, in 2011, was downright embarrassing. Even people who were nominally part of his cohort cringed. It was like watching a mastodon emerge from the ice.)