@reasoning logic,
So, basically, you're suggesting that you don't in fact have a problem with coherence--that people who attempt to understand the drivel you post have a problem if they find it incoherent. There's a perfect example of your inability to post coherently. Way to take responsibility there, Bubba.
I haven't said that theists would have no part of this discussion, i have simply pointed out that it is unlikely
that christians would, and that in any event, it wouldn't change what they believe. Specifically i referred to christians, you don't get to change my terms. All christians are theists, but not all theists are christians. That's an example of your coherence problem, you either don't understand or are not concerned with valid distinctions between and within groups which may have family resemblence.
So, for example, when make you completely unsubtantiated claim that christians "have little interest in trying to know the nature of reality," does that mean that Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, Animists, etc., do have such an interest? The sloppy use here of theists and christians as interchangeable terms is an example of your incoherence.
Most of the work which is the foundation of modern science was done by people who were at least nominally christians, and many of whom professed christianity explicity, including members of the clergy. Most of the work which is the foundation of modern mathematics was done by people who were at least nominally christians and many of whom professed christianity explicitly. You've smeared a significant portion of humanity on no very good basis--simply because they are/were christians.
It's not just that your writing lacks coherence, your ideas are a mess, too.
