@hawkeye10,
I agree, in general, with what you are saying, but not that the current low level of charitable response for the African famine is an indication that the gerneral population does as well.
There's just too much other **** going on.
If there was nothing else taking up the news, a few weepy Hollywood stars took up the cause, and the NY Times Editorial Board got on board...voila! A whole new crop of pop stars would be singing "We are the world," and money would flow --- just not as much as in the past when unemployment was below 5%.
People may have become desensitized to the pictures of African babies with swollen bellies and flies crawling across their eye-balls and an attiude that can be expressed as "What the hell? They're starving again?" may have developed out of sense of frustration, but I don't think very many people have thought about why this is a recurring tragedy.
I remember a comedy bit of the late, great Sam Kinnison that focused on starvation in Ethiopia. I'm poorly paraphrasing but his set up was something like "What a surprise, you live in a desert where there's never rain and crops never grow." The punchline was "******* MOVE!!!!!! GO SOMEWHERE WHERE FOOD GROWS!!!"
Obviously a mass exodus from the places hit by famine is not a real solution, but the joke does speak to how tiring it is to hear of the same tragedy occuring in the same places on a regular basis.
The difficulty with this attitude is that the people starving to death are not the ones who have caused the problem, unless you feel it is reasonabl that they have not risen up in revolution to rid their governments of corrupt strongmen.
Of course, it is less likely they will do so if every time one of these famines strikes, the world comes to the rescue and just enough food gets through to them that the sense of desperation is mitigated.
It truly is tragic.
To expect ignorant people to individually arrive at the solutions to this problem (whether it be alternative farming methods or population control) is simply not realistic.
They are living hand to mouth; day to day. If they can scratch out a subsitence living farming cash crops, and they need the free labor of their own children to assure that happens, that's the path they will follow.
The problem is a lack of honest leadership.
European Colonialists can't be blamed in perpitutiy for the fact that leaders who have actually cared about their people and their nations are rare in Africa. Their successors, as has been suggested, though do bear some share of the responsibility for reflexively responding to their sense of national guilt by throwing money at the problem.
I certainly don't see any hope, anytime soon for the African people.