23
   

Is this the beginning of the end of Rupert Murdoch's media empire?

 
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2012 03:27 am
@izzythepush,

I think she's a striking and handsome woman. She's evidently got a lot of power over men- whether that is because of the position she achieved is hard to say. Very much like Margaret Thatcher before her, who had "the lips of Marilyn Monroe, and the eyes of Caligula", and twisted men around her fingers. LOL.
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2012 03:28 am
@McTag,
I think she's very striking, too, McTag.
And love the hair! Wink
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2012 03:32 am
@msolga,
But that's a drawing, never mind, I've never liked her, but I've got a pathological hatred of The Sun anyway. Putting someone with red hair in charge of The Sun is asking for trouble.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2012 03:35 am
@izzythepush,

A red top top of a red-top! Ha!
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2012 03:38 am
@McTag,
Was Ross Noble in the military police? If so, that's a full house.
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2012 05:09 am
@izzythepush,
She fascinates me.

The novel I never dared to write concerned the infiltration of a disgraced intelligence officer into a secret organisation of women which is running the country behind the scenes based on the blackmail applied to powerful men who have been lured into their clutches by a series of escalating perversions which they have recorded on video tape.

BBC 2 last night screened the Two and a Half White Feathers episode of Dad's Army. In it there is the classic dinner-lady scene in the canteen depicting women who self-evidently had no need of Mr Foot's ridiculous Sex Discrimination Act without which we wouldn't be discussing this shambles.

When Australian Intelligence sent Germaine Greer and Rupert Murdoch into our midst to destroy the morale of English cricket they ought to have known that they would be caught up themselves in the backwash. Julia Gillard as Commander in Chief.

But the daughter of a tugboat deckhand/gardener from Warrington rising to the point of choosing the next government and which issues deserve to be top of its agenda is some feat imo.

Did anybody ever get round to counting the number of times Anna Botting used the expression "child sex abuse" during her commentary on Sky News, a Murdoch channel, during the visit of the Pope to our shores?



0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 02:24 am
Quote:
Rebekah Brooks to learn if she will face charges over phone-hacking scandal
Vikram Dodd and Dan Sabbagh
guardian.co.uk, Monday 14 May 2012 19.23 BST


CPS to announce decision in cases of journalist and six others concerning allegations of perverting the course of justice

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/5/14/1337019741144/Rebekah-Brooks-008.jpg
Rebekah Brooks leaves the high court in London after giving evidence to the Leveson inquiry last week. Photograph: Sang Tan/AP

Rebekah Brooks, the former News International chief executive, will be told on Tuesday if she is to be among the first people to face criminal charges over the phone-hacking scandal.

The Crown Prosecution Service will announce whether Brooks will face charges over allegations of perverting the course of justice relating to the phone-hacking investigation.


The CPS will announce its decision in the cases of one journalist and six members of the public, all concerning allegations of perverting the course of justice. Among those whose cases are under consideration by prosecutors are Brooks's husband, Charlie, a race horse trainer and friend of the prime minister.

Kingsley Napley, the lawyers for Rebekah Brooks, confirmed that they expected to hear from the CPS on Tuesday. The human rights and criminal litigation specialist also acts for Brooks's husband.

The decision on whether criminal charges will be brought or not has been made by Alison Levitt QC, who is the principal legal adviser to the director of public prosecutions.

Levitt is in charge of the CPS's decision-making concerning the investigations into phone hacking and other related police inquiries.

The Metropolitan police have sent files of evidence to the CPS during the course of the investigation.

In March, detective from Operation Weeting arrested Brooks and her husband at their home in Oxfordshire on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

The two were held at dawn with four others, including News International's head of security, Mark Hanna, and a driver Rebekah Brooks used. A sixth non-journalist, Cheryl Carter, Brooks's former PA, was arrested in January also on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Police said the arrests did not result from information passed to them by News Corporation's management and standards committee (MSC).

Brooks was also previously arrested on 17 July 2011 on appointment at a police station in London on suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications, contrary to Section1(1) Criminal Law Act 1977 and on suspicion of corruption allegations contrary to Section 1 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906.

The former Sun and News of the World editor was held in the summer 48 hours after she resigned as News International's chief executive.

The announcement of the CPS's decision comes days after Brooks gave five hours of evidence to the Leveson inquiry, in which Brooks discussed her friendship with Tony Blair, Gordon Brown's wife Sarah, and the prime minister, David Cameron. Cameron, she said, texted once or twice a week, signing off his messages 'LOL' until she told him it stood for 'laugh out loud'.

News International declined to comment.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/14/rebekah-brooks-cps-decision-criminal-charges
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 02:30 am
@msolga,

Ah, a woman prosecutor, eh? That's interesting, and may not be insignificant.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 02:34 am
I'd be grateful if someone from The UK could supply a bit more information, please.

How does the CPS fit into the big picture here ?.... along with the parliamentary select-committee & the Leveson Inquiry?
This is totally separate to both inquiries, yes?

It's becoming a wee bit hard to follow.
Please enlighten us. Smile

Quote:
The Crown Prosecution Service is the Government Department responsible for prosecuting criminal cases investigated by the police in England and Wales.

As the principal prosecuting authority in England and Wales, we are responsible for:

advising the police on cases for possible prosecution;

reviewing cases submitted by the police;

determining any charges in all but minor cases;

preparing cases for court;

presenting cases at court.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/about/
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 02:57 am
@msolga,
She has been charged. It's a pretty serious offence.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 02:59 am
@msolga,
Well, the Crown in Oz follows the British system pretty closely.

They are given details of possible cases to prosecute and make a determination as to whether they consider the evidence sufficient to make it possible for the case to have some chance of succeeding in court. They may choose not to take cases to court for a number of reasons.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 03:02 am
@spendius,
It could get very sticky now. She will know a lot of things about a lot of people.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 03:33 am
@msolga,
Basically the Levenson Enquiry and the Seclect Committee can just investigate and advise.

The CPS is the Crown Prosecution Service, they decide whether or not there's sufficient evidence to prosecute. So both the Brooks will be tried, and hopefully go to prison. It will get very messy now, Brooks let some stuff slip about Hunt and Cameron last week, now she'll do what she can to save her own neck.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 03:35 am
@spendius,
She has criticised the CPS for its " weak and unjust decision".

That's going to put some backs up.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 03:40 am
@spendius,
She still seems to be more concerned with the media than the courts.

Quote:
Revealing the charges ahead of a CPS announcement, the couple said: "We have this morning been informed by the Office of the Department of Public Prosecutions that we are to be charged with perverting the course of justice."

They added: "We deplore this weak and unjust decision.

"After the further unprecedented posturing of the CPS we will respond later today after our return from the police station."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18062485
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 04:07 am
@msolga,
The most important aspect of the CPS is its power to consider the public interest. Such a power usually works to the benefit of wrongdoers when bringing them to trial might expose other matters.

The Saudi defence contract bribery allegation was a case where I think that was decisive in their being no charges.

A public interest defence is permissable in relation to phone hacking but not in relation to the Data Protection Act. I imagine that Mr Kemp's wife will take the public interest line in her defence.

Then it will be, as in Leveson, two distinct views of what is the public interest. I feel sure great play will be made about an Establishment attempt to cover up their activities by castrating investigative journalism and the Murdoch papers being a scapegoat to frighten the others. The CPS will be portrayed as a government puppet.

Basically, senior journalists claim the right to break the law in certain respects if it is in the public interest that they thereby expose corruption and other malpractice in high places. I suppose that is Mr Assange's position.

It is a very complex matter. Once charges are laid there are restrictions on comment which will affect the Leveson Enquiry.

Announcing that she will be charged rather than actually charging her today might free up the sub judice rules in the interim. A ploy maybe.

spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 04:13 am
@spendius,
The fundamental argument relates to the weakening of the power of the political class and the consequent impairment of its ability to govern effectively when it is continually being leaked on, its phones hacked and ministers and officials briefing against each other using journalists they are cosy with.

Tony Blair did not have a mobile phone we have been informed.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 04:29 am
Thank you, all.
It's very clear now.
She is in very serious strife.

msolga
 
  0  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 04:42 am
@msolga,
Quote:
Rebekah Brooks, the former chief executive of News International, is to be charged with perverting the course of justice, the Crown Prosecution Service said on Tuesday.

She faces three charges of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice including the alleged removal of seven cases of material from the archive of News International and the alleged concealment of documents and computers from officers investigating phone hacking.
.....

Brooks and her husband were told the decision on Tuesday morning when they returned to the police station to answer bail along with the five other suspects.

The charges are as follows:

• That Rebekah Brooks between 6 July and 19 July 2011 conspired with Charles Brooks, Cheryl Carter, Mark Hanna, Paul Edwards, Daryl Jorsling and persons unknown to conceal material from officers of the Metropolitan Police Service.

• That Rebekah Brooks and Cheryl Carter between 6 July and 9 July 2011 conspired together permanently to remove seven boxes of material from the archive of News International.

• That Rebekah Brooks, Charles Brooks, Mark Hanna, Paul Edwards and Daryl Jorsling conspired together and with persons unknown, between 15 July and 19 July 2011, to conceal documents, computers and other electronic equipment from officers of the Metropolitan Police Service.

All six will appear before Westminster magistrates court on a date to be determined. .....


Rebekah Brooks to be charged with perverting the course of justice:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/may/15/rebekah-brooks-charged-perverting-course-justice
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2012 05:49 am
@msolga,

The CPS does not have a very good record of prosecuting serious cases. But this is an interesting and encouraging development.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 05:11:23