@hamilton,
hamilton wrote:
but the class that rules in a democracy is the class that has the least access to education- the lower class (nothing against them). is letting the weakest intelectuals govern us the best way to go?
I am certain you are missing the point some where... Democracy is control over your own affairs and your own future... Before a change should have the votes of all it should affect all and then, consensus should be the rule, that what all accept should be done, and what all benefit from all should pay for... In the matter of intelligence I should ask: How smart does a person have to be to know what is best for them long or short term, and even if a person makes a mistake, and finds they were convinced to act against their own best interest, so long as the right is theirs and the power is theirs, then why can they not reverse themselves... An idiot can follow a two track into a flood, but as long as he has reverse he can back right out even when there is no room to turn...
It is not the stupid we need fear for their power to hurt us is minimal... It is the intelligent raised to levels of power over us who need be feared, and more than ever in history, it is very few who control very many, and we are denied control over our own affairs... To elect people to positions where they can hide behind our rights rather than defend them, where they can be corrupted alltogether or a part at a time, and where we have no essential control over their behavior short of unelecting them, and electing some one other to be in turned corrupted is insanity... It is the repetition of behavior that resulted in past failure...If we have democracy, which is power over our own affairs and a veto on injury by others, then we would not be in the condition we are in, of having to assert, and defend every right of the people while the rulers maintain the privilages of the rich...