@Butrflynet,
SCience texts are always in danger of becoming obsolete even before they are published. As a teacher, I used to use foundational books or some recent methods book as a source. In man y courses I wouldnt use a text at all, but a list of literature sources as a course bibliography and I would request reprints from the authors(This is all a simple approved download now. We use the scientific literature journals a lot more than texts now. SO, with all the costs involved in publishing and writing the books, they are amortized on a briefer cost basis that alone has driven texts to numbers of 200% what they were just 10 years ago.A 125$ text isnt a big deal anymore. SO the value of used books is also high..
Newer creeping things are e-books (still not a big deal in science texts because of the graphics needs), self published books, or collections of downloaded papers that would be collected from journals of the peevious year and would be, for most sciences, quite up-to-date.
Currency is the key. I have a collection of science books (mostly chem, geology and biology) from the 1920's throughthe 1960's. There were so many revolutions in that pweriod that several classic texts would go through new editions as frequently as every two years, and sometimes the authors foreoword apologizes for the complete 180 degree change in certain sections of their texts . All due to scientific discoveries.
A real revolution for me was the evidence and rapid acceptance of Global Tectonics and Sea Floor spreading just after World War II. ALl the magnetometric work used to detect subs in the ATlantic began a big change in how the earth was looked at . Several classic texts became obsolete in 5 years or less and the changes kept on coming into the 1970's. Costs began to rise in geology texts quite early.