1
   

Food, water & shelter for 9 billion in 300 years?

 
 
Reply Fri 19 Dec, 2003 05:22 pm
POPULATION: U.N. Says 9 Billion Will Share Planet in 300 Years
Peter Deselaers 12/18/03 - IPS

After several fluctuations, the world's population will swell to 9 billion people by 2300, according to new projections by the United Nations.

UNITED NATIONS, Dec 9 (IPS) - "These are scenarios. No one knows the future, but we are tying to give a range of what may happen," Joseph Chamie, director of the U.N. Population Division, said at the launch of the report at United Nations headquarters in New York.

According to the medium range estimate, the world population will rise from its current 6 billion to 9 billion over the next 300 years. This projection is based on the assumption of an increasing life expectancy and that in the long run women will have an average of two children -- called replacement level fertility.

If fertility stayed at the same level it is now, the world population would be 134 trillion people in 300 years. "This outcome even surprised us," said Chamie. The population density would exceed even the most crowded parts of the world today, such as Hong Kong, with an average of more than 100 people per square meter of land (10 people per square foot).

But even if women have just slightly more than two children on average, population may well rise to more than 36 billion persons. Or, if fertility is just a little less than two children per woman, only 2.35 billion people will be living on the earth in 2300.

"What's the best guess? I think the 9 billion is not too far off," Chamie said. "I do not think we are going to see the two billion, but it could happen."

But population will not grow to the same extent in all parts of the world. While Europe's population is going to shrink from 14 percent to 7 percent, Africa's share of the world population will double from 13 percent to 24 percent in 2300. India, China and the United States will continue to be the most populous countries in the world.

"Even though we do not have a global population crisis, there are many poor countries where the population growth is a problem," said John Bongaarts, vice president of the Population Council, a New York-based non-profit organisation.

"The biggest share of the population growth is going to be in the poorest countries, which are least able to absorb them, in South Asia, in the Middle East and in Africa."

He explained that Egypt, for example, already has to import more than one-third of its basic staple food supply, but will have to absorb tens of millions of people more.

According to Chamie, the problem is not a global shortage of food. "There is plenty of food for 6 billion and for 9 billion of people," he said. "The problem generally is distribution, inequity of income and access to food."

Chamie predicts a migration flow from the rapidly growing African continent and western Asia to Europe. "The population throughout history has been redistributing itself. Tragically, immigrants are dying sometimes at sea or in cargo containers, but this trend will continue, because of the great differences between these two continents."

For the developed countries, migration is a short-term remedy to their problem of a decreasing population. If Italy's fertility stays at current levels, the population will decline from 58 million today to 600,000 in the next 300 years, according to Chamie.

Bongaarts stressed that many women in rich countries want more children than they have. The main reason for the low number of babies is that women in industrialised countries "have difficulties combining a career and family".

The main concern about a declining population is the ratio of retired persons and children to the working population.

"If you have more people retired than working, it becomes economically unsustainable," says Bongaarts, explaining that the standard of living will decline. The average age in 2300 will be about 50 years, according to the report.

Currently, it is 26 years. And nearly 40 percent of the population will be older than 60.

Chamie believes that "governments will take actions to make child bearing and having children and raising them compatible to modern life." But he also outlines some consequences of the aging population for the labor markets -- people will have to work longer, their benefits will be smaller and they will be paying more taxes to support children and old people.

"In most developing countries, women have more children than they want," Bongaarts told IPS, because they have insufficient access to contraceptives, the man wants more children, or they do not know enough about family planning. "If we empower women to have the number of children they want to have, we will have a substantially lower growths than now."

There is a strong link between a women's level of education and the number of children she has, Bongaarts says. "If I had one change, I would keep all girls in school until they are 20 that would make a huge change to their life and to society," he added.

While deaths due to war were not taken into account in the projections, the AIDS epidemic changed the calculations of the demographers significantly. According to Chamie, AIDS will have a devastating impact -- especially on Sub-Saharan Africa.

The estimated world population in 2050 was reduced by 200 million due to deaths from AIDS.

"But in the long term we assume a change of behaviour and improvement in treatment. AIDS becomes part of life, but at a much lower level than we have today," Chamie said.

The United Nations report is the first population projection which looks 300 years ahead, and also gives specific numbers for individual countries and not just regions. Population projections are used by social and environmental scientists as well as by governments and international organisations.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 468 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Dec, 2003 04:30 am
That's assuming there's anyone left alive at all. If we continue on our current course, we will have likely made the planet uninhabitable long before then.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Dec, 2003 08:53 am
That's very pessimistic, wilso. We'll exhaust fossil fuels before we have the opportunity to destroy the earth with them. (By "exhaust," I mean, "Make them so expensive to extract that it's no longer economically feasible to do so." Same difference.) The Malthusians have been consistently wrong, or at the very least delayed in the fruition of their forebodings. My own feeling du jour is that things can't be going to shite when things have always been shite...
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Dec, 2003 11:36 am
If there isn't food, water, and shelter for 9 billion, there won't be 9 billion in need of it. That's the way it works.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Food, water & shelter for 9 billion in 300 years?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 09:25:46