0
   

Marijuana

 
 
Reply Wed 5 Jan, 2011 07:21 am
It is said marijuana is anti establishment, is this just an effect of marijuana or just clearing thinking about the establishment that we are involved in?

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,386 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Jan, 2011 07:30 am
You need to work on the coherence of what you write. The notion that marijuana is "anti-establishment" derives from some rather complex history. It was originally seen as a drug of poor people--of blacks and Hispanics--and was associated with a demi-monde of musicians and artists. I believe that it is correct that the first marijuana busts were made in the 1930s.

The drug became increasingly popular with white middle class kids, though, probably as a result of their exposure to music out of the norm of their parents. Films such as Reefer Madness portrayed the drug as very dangerous to the mental health of users (it certainly does have a serious effect on the mental health of long-time, heavy users, but nothing like the hysterical tone of that motion picture). However, beginning in the 1960s, it was increasingly associated with the rebellion of youth against their parents, and the issue of drug abuse got caught up in the issue of opposition to the war in Vietnam, then the most divisive issue between the generations in the United States.

For young people in the 1960s, the establishment was an us and them matter. The establishment was "them," the generation of their parents or grandparents, the "fat cats," the capitalist exploiters, the "captains of industry"--all figures (stereotypes) who were despised by young people enamoured of the New Left and the newly identified counter-culture. To that extent, yes, marijuana can be seen as anti-establishment. From what you have written, though, it is not clear what you think the establishment is. For young people in the 1960s and -70s, it was clear. The establishment was "them," people who stood for everything with "we" despised.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Jan, 2011 07:39 am
You last sentence there is non-sensical, i have no idea what it is supposed to mean. Your view of what constitutes the establishment is pretty narrow. In the 1960s, the establishment was seen as not simply the government, but the social and capitalist establishments, too.
tommot2002
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Jan, 2011 07:43 am
@Setanta,
I had the wrong idea about what constitutes establishment. Thanks
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Why are there so many names for marijuana? - Question by RadAndRandom
Received "founded" notice from CPS - Question by kcruikshank
Marijuana - Discussion by Shadybro
Numbness after shooting heroin .... - Question by Janedoe123
Drugs, good or bad? - Question by Palivinya191
my husband is using meth behind my back - Discussion by krab2008
Please help - Question by cndunca79
Drug possession - Question by atr2012
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Marijuana
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 04:43:52