Proof of an afterlife?

Forums: Afterlife
Email this Topic • Print this Page

If you were to lose exactly 10 years of your memory at exactly age 30, to you it would seem like the day before your 20th birthday you were 19 and the day after you were 30. There is something i refer to as a "snap", this snap makes the person experiencing this loss of memory to seemingly jump forward in time from age 19 to age 30.

If this person has lived these 10 years perceivably to the rest of the world but not to them it seems that this loss of memory causes time to seem to snap.

If there is nothing after death this includes consciousness and memory. By my conclusion this snap should have already happened to us all when we reach the day in the future of our death. This day is the equivalent of of the 30th birthday and the birth day is the equivalent of the 20th birthday.

Any problems?

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,111 • Replies: 12

No top replies

What?

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

If we are all to lose our memories along with everything else on the day of our death. Surely we would all be "mid-snap" and therefore should have already jumped to the end of our journey and be inexistent.
The reality that we have not all "snapped" from our birth to our death reveals that there is at least consciousness after death.

1 Reply

@tommot2002,

It does!?

1 Reply

@roger,

To me it does

0 Replies

@tommot2002,

tommot2002 wrote:

If you were to lose exactly 10 years of your memory at exactly age 30, to you it would seem like the day before your 20th birthday you were 19 and the day after you were 30. There is something i refer to as a "snap", this snap makes the person experiencing this loss of memory to seemingly jump forward in time from age 19 to age 30.

If this person has lived these 10 years perceivably to the rest of the world but not to them it seems that this loss of memory causes time to seem to snap.

If there is nothing after death this includes consciousness and memory. By my conclusion this snap should have already happened to us all when we reach the day in the future of our death. This day is the equivalent of of the 30th birthday and the birth day is the equivalent of the 20th birthday.

Any problems?

Following your "Snap Theory," if there isn't conciousness after death then when our conciousness ends (death) we "snap" back to our first moment of conciousness (which is not necessarily the day of our birth by the way). The next instant then leads to the end of conciousness, and a "snap" back to the first and so on throughout eternity.

How do you know that this isn't happening?

0 Replies

What?

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

Keep watching Yogi, you may observe something. Smile

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Believe me, I am trying.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

edgarblythe wrote:

Believe me, I am trying.

We may not end up anywhere near coherence, but I need tommot's reply to take this any further.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Im confused with this what you have said, please explain further?

My argument stems from time "snapping" for the period of which memory is lost.
If we have nothing after death surely our whole life's memory would be lost and therefore should have already snapped to the death date, when we would lose our life's memory.

Proof of an afterlife?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know