@Phoenix32890,
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Getting back to the original question:
Going forward- Can one "go backwards"?
Entitlements- Originally, it was called "charity", which had a negative feel. Later, "welfare" was a more neutral term.Then, attempting to be "politically correct", another term of which I abhor, the word became "entitlements". Personally, I don't think that people are "entitled" to the fruits of another's work.
It may be a kindly and ultimately practical thing to do, but the recipients are certainly not "entitled" to the largesse. If people are taking money that was created by other people, let's call it what it is, and screw the sugar coating.
With every bit of due respect on the planet, sqwew you on the entitlements... This is supposed to be a commonwealth... The people originally took this land, and they hold the ultimate title to the land and what is produced in this land, and they have fought and died for this land on a thousand battlefields around the world....They are entitled to this land, and their share of the wealth and there is no part of charity involved...
They do not, and did not put the public lands in private hands to be held free and clear without a view to public benefit... It has been taken that way, and taken altogether from most of the people who once lived off of the land... If the small farmer has been driven from the land it is still the land that must support him on it, or off of it... It is his right because he holds the title to it, and if the government did not accelerate the number of people into poverty by taxing wages and leaving property and wealth free of taxation, there would be no problem... This country was designed with wealth paying taxes and it has been turned to people paying taxes out of their poverty...
This is not what the people voted for... When they first accepted the income tax as constitutional, it only affected 11 to 13 percent of the people... It was to give the people justice, and it has been turn against the people to give them injustice...
We are made after the image of the Roman commonwealth, and there too there was the corn dole, and it was only fair that people driven from their share of the commonwealth by slaves and slavery should have something good for their sacrifice... We should to, because it is our right, and it would not be a problem if those with the wealth were taxed in consideration of the rights they receive and the blood that has been spilled in defense of their rights... They want something for nothing, something they cannot defend alone, and they want the working class to lay down their lives for their peoperty and pay for the privilage... They can go to hell... Pay up or get off the gravey train...