A lot of action last night boys and girls.
Daniel Ellsberg, a US citizen, working for the Rand Corporation, on US soil, released Top Secret documents and was charged with espionage. The case was dismissed. No-one was charged for the described in the information that Ellsberg leaked.
The wikileaks organisation
received 251,287 US diplomatic cables. Of which over 130,000 of the documents are unclassified, some 100,000 are labeled "confidential", about 15,000 documents have the higher classification "secret", and none are classified as "top secret".
It's hard not to see the flailing about on this issue as largely about face saving. Targeting Assange distracts and mollifies the public.
Why hasn't there been more outcry from you about this:
Quote:In July 2009, a confidential cable originating from the United States Department of State, and under U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's name, ordered U.S. diplomats to spy on Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, and other top U.N. officials. The intelligence information the diplomats were ordered to gather included biometric information, passwords, and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications. The targeted information was requested in a process known as the National Humint Collection Directive, and was aimed at foreign diplomats of U.S. allies as well.
Is the State Department currently rifling through any law books to bring charges against Clinton with the same fervour as they are for Assange? It would be a lot easier to make something stick to the former for this clear illegality.